Personally I don’t think an entire system should have to be redesigned to suit a small minority of recalcitrant conspiracy theorists.
The biggest opponents of a cashless society are criminals and tax evaders.
Personally I split my 'pocket money' between Revolut and cash. I like cash for small amounts, tipping, giving small presents to young family.
However, I be against redesigning the system to be cashless. Just to be clear, as I far back as I remember we've used cash, the move to cashless is the redesign and I believe needs thought/consideration. I fear that vulnerable may struggle with cashless society.
- Older people, many won't use electronic payment (Absolutely not all, but I know my mother would struggle. Others her age are already at risk, a cashless society would remove some of their independence)
- Certain levels of disability, e.g. someone that can manage some level of independent living, but not everything - there are risks here regardless of cash/cashless, but cashless limits options based of persons understanding
- Cases where there's financial abuse, where one person is financially dependent on another, a cashless society would remove one of their options in terms of saving enough money to get out.