All I can say is that while looking around for pensions, 1.25% AMC was common enough. I contacted the pension provider directly and now have the exact same pension setup at 0.75% AMC.
I do fully accept that the advisory services with this direct approach are much more limited than going through a broker and this is a call people need to make themselves. I also understand that brokers have to wait a long time to actually make money at 0.5% when pensions start from.
However looking at a 25 year build up towards a €1m pension that extra 0.5% AMC represented €60k in advisory fees; I personally felt more comfortable buying advisory services myself as required, doubting I will get anywhere near €60k.
The fee is €7500 for that year only, they also paid €7450 the year before that, and €7400 the year before that etc since the policy started. The total fees for the 20-25 years they’ve built up that pension would be closer to €75,000. That’s the figure people need to consider when deciding if it is worth it.Its relative to the service provided. if your advisor is putting the work in and adding value the fee is worth it. If your advisor is only executing for you then there should be no trail fee.
Say you have a client that is 70 with an ARF worth 1.5m. The fee would be 7,500.
Service could involve the following:
4X Meetings a year,
Managing the investment strategy,
Managing client anxiety especially with markets being volatile,
Providing Financial Modelling,
Providing estate planning services
Contantly reviewing the plan.
Managing admin of policies
etc.
Then there is all the compliance regulations that they have to comply it.
For all the above 7,500 is cheap! The fee is worth it for good advisors.
So what is the total annual cost of the cheapest passive Buy Out Bond and who’s it through?
So what is the total annual cost of the cheapest passive Buy Out Bond and who’s it through?
Hi StevenZurich and Standard have 0.5% as their lowest AMC. Standard have a few Vanguard funds with a .1% rebate on them.
Thanks Steven but could you clarify what you mean by the "base" allocation? Does that mean the insured only receives a 98% allocation if the broker takes a 2% commission?
What is the lowest AMC with a 100% allocation?
Well, it certainly lacks transparency.It's as clear as mud.
The Central Bank's website has a complaints email - enquiries@centralbank.ie - although with a name like "enquiries" I wouldn't hold my breath.It's amazing to me that the Central Bank allows this lack of transparency to continue.
Well, it certainly lacks transparency.
I don't really have an issue with the complexity of the charging structures (they're really not that complicated) - I just wish pension providers would publish their pricing options so consumers could check whether or not they are being ripped off by intermediaries.
It's amazing to me that the Central Bank allows this lack of transparency to continue.
Well, I certainly didn't know that – here's a link for anybody that's interested:The Pensions Authority has a list of all authorised PRSA and the approved charging structures. How many people look at that? Most people aren't aware its there.
Well, I certainly didn't know that – here's a link for anybody that's interested:
https://www.pensionsauthority.ie/en/PRSA_Providers/PRSAs/
Not sure where the execution-only PRSAs that are available through discount brokers fit into that list.
Well, it certainly lacks transparency.
I don't really have an issue with the complexity of the charging structures (they're really not that complicated) - I just wish pension providers would publish their pricing options so consumers could check whether or not they are being ripped off by intermediaries.
It's amazing to me that the Central Bank allows this lack of transparency to continue.
That's interesting. So do the life companies retrocede the additional 25bps to the discount broker on an annual basis?Discount brokers aren't PRSA providers. They use Zurich Life or Irish Life who offer the PRSA at 100% allocation, 0.75% amc. They add 0.25% amc onto it which is their margin
To be fair, Brokers do more than just passing on a blank form. If clients want advice about establishing a PRSA, which provider, what fund(s) etc, then it must be paid for. And if the client wants ongoing advice that also must be paid for. Brokers are not charities. You are paying for advice, experience etc.That's interesting. So do the life companies retrocede the additional 25bps to the discount broker on an annual basis?
It seems weird to me that anybody would get paid anything material (particulatly on an ongoing basis) for effectively just passing on a blank form.
I'm obviously in the wrong business...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?