aircobra19
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,733
No...it applies to all situations. Not just corners...I'm talking about bends on b roads. And it's not limited to high speed only. I've driven plenty of front wheel drive cars where you can really feel the understeer on windy roads at comfortable speeds...which makes you break a lot. It's just not an issue at the same speeds with rwd.
Sweeping generalisation is not useful. An original Elise is 118bhp, MR2 122bhp.
As said, its over-rated unless in something that weighs the same as a push bike.
Actually getting back to the point, so the only thing the BMW has over the cupra is RWD and thats only when going around corners. AHEM OK....
Theres something wrong with how you drive so, there is a difference but it isn't as clear cut as that. IMO.
That depends on what speed "your" comfortable with, and no thats not RWD thats BMW marketing for you. LOL the ultimate driving machine!
I'd nearly bet you have a fwd car. Perhaps a Seat?
...tired and tested chassis, (audi TT)...
...the 1.9 engine is also more reliable for say a 01 320D which suffers turbo
issues.
I'd nearly bet you have a fwd car. Perhaps a Seat?
I'd nearly bet you have a ford escort with an RS 2000 kit. Owned many cars a SEAT cupra being one of them, and a 318 being one also, your point.
horses for courses.
At the time the TT was "reportedly" one of the best, its a good place to start i guess.
Cheers for the input. Heart saying beemer, head skoda but this cupra has intrigued both. Must do some research on them. 5Times assume you driven one-is 150 overkill-bordering on dangerous? Traction control standard?
Nice spec alright. Are they much lot cheaper than a BMW.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?