Jeez well I am a Klutz! There I've been completing fact finds and writing statements of suitability for the last 20 years when all I had to do was pick the best rate from a website. Think of all the money I'll save in levies to the Central bank and professional indemnity insurance premiums.
Incognito, unregulated opinions the future of financial advice.
And now that the OP has given more details, are you going to give him free advice over the Internet? I doubt it. He wanted some advice on best returns, "all other things being equal". You could have thrown out a few ideas, "all other things being equal", rather than tell him he can't decide anything at all until he goes into excruciating detail about his circumstances.
And if you have no idea what you are trying to achieve, then any solution will do...
The objective is to obtain the return you need to achieve your financial objectives, without taking on more risk than is needed to achieve that return. The higher the return you need, the higher the risks you are going to have to take on, so it makes no since to risk everything going for a return of say 12.5% pa, if a lower return with a lower risk will get you where you need to be. It is not a competition, although may people seem to think it is.
That's incorrect. Very few people have a specific return in mind -- how could they possibly plan that with the vagaries of inflation etc.? People want to maximise their return while taking "acceptable" risk. The latter isn't strictly quantifiable. For instance, can you provide odds that you are prepared to stand over for each deposit taker in Ireland going bust in the next five years, or taking a deposit haircut? I doubt it, and if you told me I wouldn't believe you.
I think the people in the investment advice business on here need to understand that sometimes the questioner isn't sure what they want, and wants to ask some general questions. Telling them there's a million things to consider first is just going to scare them off.