And again you've neatly sidestepped my point.
You referenced my post , suggested that you were taking it at " face value " and stated that I suggested that the two teachers in question were overworked , underpaid and further stated that I suggested that they should were right to give up the voluntary work - as I say absolute and utter nonsense on your part.
You are merely misquoting me for your own ends.
Of course the teachers are entitled to be angry,bitter and disillusioned about two unilateral pay cuts , would'nt you be ?
Of course they feel undervalued and given the rather slewed view of the job they do by the media and by some members of the public as I said I can see their point of view
Let's not kid ourselves that this = real debate.Nice dodge...avoid getting into a real debate...blah,blah,blah....
Very well put purple..
dondub; I was pointing out that if I were to take the posts at face value,the reply would be as I had stated, ie;agree with everything the posters state about teachers being underpaid and overworked etc.
I showed how the answer would look and hopefully how ridiculous it would look.
Which obviously worked..
I understood thedaras post to be an imaginary situation where he would show his response to you and others who take a certain view of the teachers.
It was later posts which brought the topic down, to a point now where it's getting silly.
I didn't take thedaras initial post to be imaginary, like wise deiseblues initial post did not take a certain view of the teachers. He was just relaying how two teacher friends of his felt!
.
Above is the post you speak of.B]Heres how the debate would look..
Ah the poor things, thats terrible..They should do less hours,get more money, definitely no more voluntary work,please God let them have time to do little jobs around the house and bring ,the missus out for a pint.
No way are they withdrawing their services due to paycuts,bless them for all the extra unpaid effort they've put in over the years,and not even being acknowledged by us or their employer.
[/B]
Could you expand please,why would you think 253 was imaginary?
I have no idea why post 253 would be thought of as imaginary?
DonDub, I find debating with Complainer about the Public Sector and/or left wing politics is like arguing evolution with a creationist; you can present any facts you like but they will be countered with dogma. It's pointless.
Some posters never offer an opinion; they are above entering into a debate with the ill-informed masses. They just snipe from the side lines. The best tactic when dealing with then is to point out the flaws in their points rather than rising to the bait.
#346
Today, 11:43 AM
brigade
Frequent Poster
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonDub
I understood thedaras post to be an imaginary situation where he would show his response to you and othe rs who take a certain view of the teachers.
It was later posts which brought the topic down, to a point now where it's getting silly.Brigade"I didn't take thedaras initial post to be imaginary, like wise deiseblues initial post did not take a certain view of the teachers. He was just relaying how two teacher friends of his felt!
[/QUOTE).
Don dub is correct is his post above.
You will need to point out what the "initial " post has to do with anything!!I never suggested that the initial post was an imaginary situation.
As you can see don dub is referring to how I posted about a situation if I was to agree with everything.
You then mention post 253,I am totally baffled as to what your point is.
Unfortunately, if I found it necessary to provide factual rebuttals to all the nonsense posted on AAM about public services and public sector, it would be a full time job.
If SIPTU do the same it looks like it will be passed by ICTU.
And do you think they will?
(Might read as a smart-ass response but it's a genuine question!)
a high acceptance by Impact yes, but a low turn out, 50 odd % which surprised me, as the turn out for previous votes was higher as far as I remember.There was a strong acceptance from Impact (77%) so I would be surprised it SIPTU rejected it.
I know other PS workers on AAM are against the deal but I honestly don't there will be any thing better on offer.
It will be interesting to see how it plays out as it looks like 'frontline staff' such as nurses, teacher etc will reject it and 'non-frontline' staff will accept.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?