S
S.L.F
Guest
Would the average tradesman build the risk of paying interest and penalties to Revenue when they get round to catching up with them into their cost-benefit analysis?
I think the way it works is they only get cash sometimes so they do pay tax just not enough.
I've heard stories of guys operating their lives around cash.
Very foolhardy IMO.
All very well, apart from the legal and moral obligations, what if they have a wife as an adult dependent and some kids to support, unemployment benefit could easily amount to approx 350e. In addition tax dodgers may lose out on the contributory state pension as well as illness, dental, disability benefits etc etc. They also fail to gain the considerable tax relief available from contributing to private pensions
In addition, welfare staff and no doubt revenue will want to know what these people were doing all these x number of years when they weren't registered as unemployed.
They will instead have to go on strict means tested benefits in which case the gains made from their ill gotton ways will come back to bite them where it hurts.
As a tax payer I don't like the way they work, it doesn't make any sense to me why someone would try to defraud the country of taxes.
We all know how well spent our taxes are.
When I price jobs I include taxes I have to pay, they don't, so end up having cheaper quotes than me.
This of course annoys me.
The other thing that annoys me on AAM is people talking about getting tradesmen to do jobs for cash.
I pay taxes they should too.