Calling anyone who voted Yes to Lisbon 2"you suckers" is not respectful or particularly rational. It is a populist statement not an argument supported by facts. And it attempts to state a perceived problem without any focus on a possible solution.
You miss the point that not everyone voted for Lisbon because of the corporation tax guarantee. There were in fact several guarantees which collectively may have swayed the 2nd vote.
The text of the guarantee:
http://ec.europa.eu/ireland/lisbon_treaty/lisbon_treaty_progress/index_en.htm
But even this is an assumption. Who knows what the motivations were? The 1st referendum was also only lost by a small minority which indicated that quite a number were already in favour without any guarantees. You also miss the point that, as other posters have pointed out, the guarantee stands. There is a difference between France & Germany or whoever trying to get us to relinquish it by argument, and being able to actually over-ride it legally. If I have a contract with you, I may want to change it, but I can only do this with you consent, so there is no contradiction in both having a contract and wanting to re-negotiate it, But as I already pointed out, there are solid arguments against doing this from both Ireland and Europe's perepctives, and they are one's we should use.
Notwithstanding all this, there is clearly a problem with the Euro, and we need to fix it. Knowing how the EU operates, and the muddle that normally comes out of the deals they make,it isn't very inspiring. One EU statesman (anonymously) said that they know how to fix the problem, but they don't know how to get re-elected afterwards.
What do you propose we should do?
You miss the point that not everyone voted for Lisbon because of the corporation tax guarantee. There were in fact several guarantees which collectively may have swayed the 2nd vote.
The text of the guarantee:
http://ec.europa.eu/ireland/lisbon_treaty/lisbon_treaty_progress/index_en.htm
But even this is an assumption. Who knows what the motivations were? The 1st referendum was also only lost by a small minority which indicated that quite a number were already in favour without any guarantees. You also miss the point that, as other posters have pointed out, the guarantee stands. There is a difference between France & Germany or whoever trying to get us to relinquish it by argument, and being able to actually over-ride it legally. If I have a contract with you, I may want to change it, but I can only do this with you consent, so there is no contradiction in both having a contract and wanting to re-negotiate it, But as I already pointed out, there are solid arguments against doing this from both Ireland and Europe's perepctives, and they are one's we should use.
Notwithstanding all this, there is clearly a problem with the Euro, and we need to fix it. Knowing how the EU operates, and the muddle that normally comes out of the deals they make,it isn't very inspiring. One EU statesman (anonymously) said that they know how to fix the problem, but they don't know how to get re-elected afterwards.
What do you propose we should do?
Last edited: