Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,759
what i cant understand and have never understood, why are the CB, Padraig Kissane and all the experts in this area so dismissive of this group.
Hi Brendan, in fairness you have said that to me before and if i remember correctly i have suggested this before to the group. I feel if enough on this thread feel there is a case to answer we should meet up and prepare a case for the FSPO as i certainly cannot afford court personally and i dont think theres enough people to take a joint case. Brendan has said it here folks so if enough people feel as i do then let us know on this thread and we can discuss what we need to do and provide for an FSPO case. Maybe but maybe there are people who have already got a case in with the FSPO so possibly if those people wish others could maybe contribute help to those. Other than that im all ears as to what if anything we can do. At the end of the day if we got a definition of what a Variable base rate mortgage is through the FSPO that would possibly make or finally kill off this arguement. and why people who signed up for one are now paying an SVR mortgage despite these letters not being in their contract.Hi Tony
The fact that Padraic or anyone else thinks that you don't have a case, does not mean you don't have a case.
I disagreed with Padraic on the BoI staff mortgages. I thought that they had no case, but Francesca gave most of them their trackers back.
So don't be put off by the fact that we don't see your case.
If a few of you think you have a case, then get together. Put a case into the Ombudsman. Don't assume it's time barred. Leave that to the Ombudsman to decide. He might hear the case and leave it up to EBS to claim that it's time barred. If EBS is very confident, they might not invoke the statute of limitations.
Brendan
Hi I have been following this thread for a long time, and have indeed myself been fighting my my mortgage rate for 2 years. Even though I applied for a tracker mortgage in 2008 I was told that they were no longer being offered, (when I received my information from the EBS there was indeed a tracker offer in it - I never received this offer, nor did the solicitor named on the offer) so I took the banks advice and applied for a 2 year fixed mortgage, this was to go to a variable base rate at the end of the two years. One of the specific conditions of this fixed term mortgage was that my tracker application be up-to-date. This has been part of my query with the bank to which they simply replied "sorry that was a mistake that condition should have been removed before you were offered your mortgage". I have had many other questions and issues with my mortgage and I have engaged PK, however the EBS still claims I am not impacted. If the person who was redressed in the text above could send a private message I'm would be very grateful as their case sounds very similar to my own.A poster on this forum was redressed and put back on the tracker because they had a fixed to variable base contract but also signed a tracker application form
I wouldn’t say it’s pointless as there are inconsistencies in the documentation that each variable base customer has received. A poster on this forum was redressed and put back on the tracker because they had a fixed to variable base contract but also signed a tracker application form. Other variable base customers have additional documentation confirming the variable base is a tracker rate. Some variable base customers have been informed by EBS that they can’t locate the loan application forms so it can’t be confirmed what type of mortgage the customer applied for in the first place. No harm in getting PK to have a look at your case to see if it’s worth pursuing.
EBS seemed to have consistently made the same mistake with many variable base customers i.e. indicating that the variable base was a tracker or at the very least being ambiguous about the type of variable rate underlying fixed rate mortgages. These cases really should be brought to the FSPO.Hi I have been following this thread for a long time, and have indeed myself been fighting my my mortgage rate for 2 years. Even though I applied for a tracker mortgage in 2008 I was told that they were no longer being offered, (when I received my information from the EBS there was indeed a tracker offer in it - I never received this offer, nor did the solicitor named on the offer) so I took the banks advice and applied for a 2 year fixed mortgage, this was to go to a variable base rate at the end of the two years. One of the specific conditions of this fixed term mortgage was that my tracker application be up-to-date. This has been part of my query with the bank to which they simply replied "sorry that was a mistake that condition should have been removed before you were offered your mortgage". I have had many other questions and issues with my mortgage and I have engaged PK, however the EBS still claims I am not impacted. If the person who was redressed in the text above could send a private message I'm would be very grateful as their case sounds very similar to my own.
I submitted my case to the FSPO in the last few days. My case is very similar to tonymac's partner, only we took out our mortgage in 2004 and fixed for 1 year before rolling over to the infamous ' variable base rate'. We receive the usual letter every month from EBS stating they are continuing to investigate our case but advising that a complaint can also be submitted to FSPO accompanying the monthly letter. I've now taken them up on this and await further developments!
Best of luck whyindeed, do keep us posted wont you like i did when i went to PKiss with my partners. I havent given up on an FSPO case yet but was very disappointed with the response i got. Hopefully you have sent in that final response letter with youre application as it is crucial but im sure from seeing youre posts youll have done that.I submitted my case to the FSPO in the last few days. My case is very similar to tonymac's partner, only we took out our mortgage in 2004 and fixed for 1 year before rolling over to the infamous ' variable base rate'. We receive the usual letter every month from EBS stating they are continuing to investigate our case but advising that a complaint can also be submitted to FSPO accompanying the monthly letter. I've now taken them up on this and await further developments!
Yes. It was referenced in the Oireachtas meeting (I think McGrath mentioned it?). Decisions likely to be made by the FSPO in coming weeks I’d say.Is there any chance our situation will be addressed in the next few months ?
EBS will provide a retrospective definition of the variable base rate i.e. it’s an SVR. But I do wonder what the FSPO will think if EBS admit there was no definition in the original mortgage documentation that customers signed.We will just have to wait until ger deering gives his options on what is so obviously an ambiguous contract flaw at the least , if it goes against us I just want to hear someone explain to me what is the definition of a VARIABLE BASE RATE. simple.
Hi B26354, i do hope that Mr Deering realises that there was no definition as i find it hard to believe that EBS will just admit, rather that theyll somehow be forced to. Agree totally with you that theyll say its an SVR even though weve said numerous times on this site that the letters SVR never appear in this type of mortgage contract and now magically overnight they just decided that they are SVRs.EBS will provide a retrospective definition of the variable base rate i.e. it’s an SVR. But I do wonder what the FSPO will think if EBS admit there was no definition in the original mortgage documentation that customers signed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?