What can we expect to happen if the euro collapses?

Another respected observer predicts the demise of the euro...

SocGen’s Edwards Sees Euro Breakup as Feldstein Predicts Change Feb. 12 (Bloomberg) --

The Greek budget crisis is a symptom of imbalances that will lead to the breakup of the euro region, according to Societe Generale SA strategist [broken link removed], and Harvard University Professor Martin Feldstein said monetary union “isn’t working” in its current form.

Southern European countries are trapped in an overvalued currency and suffocated by low competitiveness, top-ranked Edwards wrote in a report today. Feldstein, speaking on Bloomberg Radio, said a one-size-fits-all monetary policy has fueled big deficits as countries’ fiscal records differ.
The problem for countries including Portugal, Spain and Greece “is that years of inappropriately low interest rates resulted in overheating and rapid inflation,” Edwards wrote.

Even if governments “could slash their fiscal deficits, the lack of competitiveness within the euro zone needs years of relative (and probably given the outlook elsewhere, absolute) deflation. Any help given to Greece merely delays the inevitable breakup of the euro zone.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ahuQR4YFStHQ&pos=5
 
How can you take seriously the views of BLOOMBERG and its biased guests. The station is always cheerleading the american economy and pouring doubt on China and the euro.This is to bolster the dollar even as the dollar printing presses are going into overdrive.Sterling has also fallen against the dollar yet that fact is ignored.
 
sunrock said:
How can you take seriously the views of BLOOMBERG and its biased guests. The station is always cheerleading the american economy and pouring doubt on China and the euro.This is to bolster the dollar even as the dollar printing presses are going into overdrive.Sterling has also fallen against the dollar yet that fact is ignored.
Click to expand...

Bloomberg, CNN, CNBC, Fox they are all generally rubbish and still sell the American dream and sprout short term buy signals. They rarely offer any real long term investment advice.

Nonetheless, they do occassionally bring on some 'real' guests in the form of Albert Edwards, Peter Schiff, Marc Faber & Jim Rogers.

Guys who know what they are talking about when it comes to long term macro moves. It is just important to differentiate between the chaff and the very few real economists in the world today.

In terms of the euro; it is a flawed concept and will collapse eventually.

How can you ever expect to merge the economies and currency of 16 countries with different languages, cultures, economic stages of development and social practicies? You simply can't.

The dollar is flawed also long term, but at least it speaks with the voice of one country and one government. The euro experiment has never been tried before in history.

I see a slow decline and eventual breakup for the euro, maybe over a decade or so.

The efficient and wealthy Germans will want out at some point. Their taxpayers will not want to prop up every other country that they have no real historical ties to.

http://www.moneyweek.com/blog/why-germany-should-dump-the-euro-00122.aspx

Eventually Europe will return to its original and proper aim of being a free market for the movement of goods, capital, services and people.

The failed socialist economics of even greater integration will disappear and allow Europe to compete once more on the global stage.

Unfortunately it will take a decade or so of further federalist and large state failure before we see any positive economic change.
 
dontaskme said:
It would be one thing to bring in new punts, it would be another to get people to use them without it turning into a Zimbabwe situation.
Click to expand...

You only get a Zimbabwe situation where you have a State run economy that has no idea about real economics.

If the economy is sound and supported by a large private sector and small public sector then a Zimbabwe situation shouldn't occur.

If you allow the currency to float freely, have no cost controls in place, and have 'real' producing private sectors of the economy, that sell products to the world with a large trade surplus then you will have a strong currency.

Also an economy that-

- Allows inward and outward free movement of international capital without any restrictions.
- Has low corporation and personal taxes.
- A large private healthcare and education system reducing the burden on the state.
- Is 85%-90% private sector. A minimal state sector is required to create real wealth.

It is bad government policies (socialism and statism) that leads to a currency collapse, not the fact that a country has a small economy and currency relative to the rest of the world.

Look at the economic success of Singapore over the past 40 years. An excellent model for any small country to copy.

4.5 Million population and an unbelievably amount of wealth held in their Soverign Wealth funds and foreign currency reserves.

Probably the richest nation on earth (per person), yet one of the smallest.
 
ringledman said:
You only get a Zimbabwe situation where you have a State run economy that has no idea about real economics.

If the economy is sound and supported by a large private sector and small public sector then a Zimbabwe situation shouldn't occur.

If you allow the currency to float freely, have no cost controls in place, and have 'real' producing private sectors of the economy, that sell products to the world with a large trade surplus then you will have a strong currency.

Also an economy that-

- Allows inward and outward free movement of international capital without any restrictions.
- Has low corporation and personal taxes.
- A large private healthcare and education system reducing the burden on the state.
- Is 85%-90% private sector. A minimal state sector is required to create real wealth.

It is bad government policies (socialism and statism) that leads to a currency collapse, not the fact that a country has a small economy and currency relative to the rest of the world.

Look at the economic success of Singapore over the past 40 years. An excellent model for any small country to copy.

4.5 Million population and an unbelievably amount of wealth held in their Soverign Wealth funds and foreign currency reserves.

Probably the richest nation on earth (per person), yet one of the smallest.
Click to expand...


As I see it, if the Irish government tried to replace the euro with new punts or whatever, people would see this straight away as a bad policy and would want no part of it. People would start hoarding dollars, euros, sterling, swiss francs.

Public servants would get paid in new punts but would probably try to convert into euros or sterling as soon as possible. If no-one wants the new currency everyone is a seller and no-one is a buyer then the new currency will tend towards valueless.

Assume that hedge funds will jump on the bandwagon and sell it down and it could easily lead to hyperinflation. Hyperinflation would have the advantage that people's debts would be wiped out, but so would their deposits, so the banks would be even more worthless, if that's possible.

According to the Sindo, this was one of George Lee's secret policies but it would need a government with a higher popularity rating than 13% to carry it out.
 
It is true we could be more competitive if we ditched the euro and changed to the punt, as the new currency would be heavily sold and thus fall in value. The net result would be de facto wage/welfare reduced purchasing power for everyone as prices would rise alarmingly and everyone would change their punts to other currencies asap.This is an incredibly risky and reckless policy and if George Lee was in favor of it,we`re well rid of him.If we want to get our cost base down we can continue with the safe and steady cuts that the government will carry out and still have the stability of the euro.We are lucky that there is a lot of fat to cut and the people will just have to get on with it.
 
As this question ranks alongside other questions such as:

"What would happen if aliens invaded the earth?" and "What would happen to my mortgage repayments if a nuclear war obliterated civilisation?".

does it really have a place on a serious discussion board such as askaboutmoney?

It's very easy for the likes of McWilliams and George Lee to say that the country would be better off if we took their advice and pulled out of the Euro because they know it will never happen so they will never be proven wrong.

Turn back the clock a couple of thousand years and the equivalent question would be

"Should we stop using gold coins and go back to bartering?".

You cant stop progress.
 
Csirl ,you make a very valid point . However it is a good exercise to dicuss it thoroughly because in these recessionary times, some credible people like Mcwilliams and allegedly Lee trot out this panacaea.Why? I am not really sure...probably because they crave popularity with the general public. And we all know that politicians would do or promise anything to win votes.Granted once in power they usually renege on their promises,but then again we might get a few headstrong ones who won`t realise the implications until it is too late.
 
csirl said:
As this question ranks alongside other questions such as:

"What would happen if aliens invaded the earth?" and "What would happen to my mortgage repayments if a nuclear war obliterated civilisation?".

does it really have a place on a serious discussion board such as askaboutmoney?

It's very easy for the likes of McWilliams and George Lee to say that the country would be better off if we took their advice and pulled out of the Euro because they know it will never happen so they will never be proven wrong.

Turn back the clock a couple of thousand years and the equivalent question would be

"Should we stop using gold coins and go back to bartering?".

You cant stop progress.
Click to expand...

So progress is a union of 16 different economies at different stages of development all with different interest rate and monetary requirements but all having one central bank and one interest rate???

It is not a question of Ireland pulling out, but rather having in place a plan to deal with the situation when the euro eventually breaks up or Germany leaves - http://www.moneyweek.com/blog/why-germany-should-dump-the-euro-00122.aspx

Clearly Ireland couldn't leave now but the possibility of the euro currency collapsing is a real one.

Who 24 months ago would ever have believed that major global banks would collapse or fannie and freddie may would become the largest bailouts in the history of the world?

The euro demise will take time. Within 10 years it could well be gone or some of its members having decided to leave.

Progress has resulted in countless currency and country collapses over the centuries.

The euro has many fundamental flaws.
 
"What would happen if aliens invaded the earth?" and "What would happen to my mortgage repayments if a nuclear war obliterated civilisation?".

does it really have a place on a serious discussion board such as askaboutmoney?
Click to expand...
Please could you clarify? Do you think it's a foregone conclusion that the Euro will break up?
At the moment, it does seem frighteningly likely, but it hasn't happened yet!

I was thinking a possible solution to save the Euro would be tax harmonisation coupled with universal public sector benchmarking across the EU.
 
The Euro wont break up. The Euro is a currency - it is NOT an economy. The strengths and weaknesses of particular economies or the indebtness of particular banks are totally different to the concept of a large group of people agreeing to use a common currency in order to make transactions between them easier. If we get to the stage where people no longer trust paper money, then deficits will be the least of our worries. So, if you think the Euro is going to collapse, you obviously believe that that our civilisation and society is going to collapse.
 
umop3p!sdn said:
Please could you clarify? Do you think it's a foregone conclusion that the Euro will break up?
At the moment, it does seem frighteningly likely, but it hasn't happened yet!

I was thinking a possible solution to save the Euro would be tax harmonisation coupled with universal public sector benchmarking across the EU.
Click to expand...

I believe that the Euro is as likely to collapse as those two events, which are improbable.
 
csirl said:
The Euro wont break up.
Click to expand...

What about a country leaving? Having control over its own interest rates and being able to devalue a currency might outweigh any benefit of being a euro member.
This might appeal to smaller countries.
 
Shawady said:
What about a country leaving? Having control over its own interest rates and being able to devalue a currency might outweigh any benefit of being a euro member.
This might appeal to smaller countries.
Click to expand...

But once the hedge funds get a sniff of fear they will be all over the new currency like a pack of wolverines. The only way to avoid hyperinflation would be to let interest rates go through the roof.

The euro is at least some way stable because of the size of the eurozone. People talk about volatility when it moves 2 or 3% over a week but if you wanted to see real volatility just imagine what would happen if the drachma or the lira were reintroduced.
 
One might remember that until 2003 the Euro was always under parity with the USD; the band was 0.85 to 0.95
The initial setup of the Euro was to be on par (or thereabouts) with the USD.
Insofar (and only insofar) the Euro has "failed" (if you really looking for a failure) as this target has not been achieved since Feb 2003 (or thereabouts). So if people talk about a devaluation of the Euro please keep this in mind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top