truthseeker
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,577
I agree that people have different standards of what is considered polite. But like not dressing appropriately for the occasion, not turning up on time and disrupting the proceedings, telling people what to get them without being asked first is not acceptable ettiquette.
I reckon if I did any of the above things at your wedding you would think I was rude (regardless of whether I thought it wasn't). And I wouldn't think you were repressed for thinking that. Weddings are very controlled occasions, rife with ettiquette rules for guests. The wedding party should follow their ettiquette side of the bargain too, regardless if whether they think it's repressed!
So yep - err on the side of caution because your guests will be doing the same I hope!
The things you say are true but there is a subtle difference between social ettiquette (i.e., how to dress and behave appropriately at a social event that has reasonably well defined social 'rules' and 'constraints') and what people consider rude in behaviour that happens in 'private' (like receiving a wedding invitation which is effectively a private transaction between a couple and an individual or another couple).
So turning up to someones wedding in jeans and a tee-shirt will not only offend the bride and groom but also many other guests (maybe) but reading an invite that states cash only offends you and only you - in private (well until you tell others I guess).
The point Im trying to get at is this - behaviour in public or at a social event is defined by cultural norms and societies definition of 'acceptable behaviour', behaviour that happens in private between people is generally defined by some amount of cultural norm but also by the relationship between the two people and what is acceptable in that context. Like you'd talk about your sex life with your best friend but not with your mother perhaps? Do you see what I mean?
So perhaps the people who send out the cash only invites feel that their relationship with their guests is such that this is acceptable behaviour from them. Presumably people invite guests to their wedding that they have a relationship of some description with?
I with you on the idea of ettiquette - but Id be more inclined to state 'formal attire' on the invites if it was going to be an issue for me.
As for the point you are making - its manners to wait til youre asked - yes it is better manners in some contexts - are weddings going in a different contextual direction though?