A website should make accommodation for as many browsers as possible ...
I did say "as possible" but then again it IS possible to write cross platform code that works perfectly well on different browsers. It doesn't take that much extra effort to write code that degrades gracefully. I suspect a major part of the problem is inexperienced developersNo theres a practical consideration. Depends on the budget, and the number of users with different browsers. Theres the 80/20 rule. No point spending 50% of effort on 5% of users. The only way you'll know if by tracking what browsers are hitting your site.
I disagree. Websites should be written to comply with published standards, not to work with specific products. The original concept was to build web-sites that didn't need a specific OS, hardware or closed, proprietary tools to work. Some browsers, for example iCab, give users a simple option to highlight non-standard web-sites.A website should make accommodation for as many browsers as possible - ...
I disagree. Websites should be written to comply with published standards, not to work with specific products. The original concept was to build web-sites that didn't need a specific OS, hardware or closed, proprietary tools to work. Some browsers, for example iCab, give users a simple option to highlight non-standard web-sites.
I disagree. Websites should be written to comply with published standards, not to work with specific products. The original concept was to build web-sites that didn't need a specific OS, hardware or closed, proprietary tools to work. Some browsers, for example iCab, give users a simple option to highlight non-standard web-sites.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?