His dispute seems to be with the insurance company and not the airline so is your incident relevant here?Do not give up.
I had a dispute with Malev recently and I just kept annoying them until they paid up (which they did last week)
No it was not meant to be anything other than the fact that if you persist you have a better chance of winning.His dispute seems to be with the insurance company and not the airline so is your incident relevant here?
Do not give up.
I had a dispute with Malev recently and I just kept annoying them until they paid up (which they did last week)
I had just watched Michael Moore's film on the state of the health service when I posted this and what I took from it is that just because you have a right to something and it is a just right, does not mean that you are going to get it. You still have to fight for it.So the OP should persist in claiming money from his insurance policy for something which is not covered? This is no different than the compo culture that sees people claim from e.g. Dublin City Council for injuries caused elsewhere. The fact that there has been a loss and you WANT there to be coverage doesnt mean that there IS coverage. This is an insurance contract which covers specific events - it is not a discretionary thing like when an airline gives you some money to go away. Policyholders sign up and should understand what they are and are not getting - I have a VHI travel policy and dont want the premium increasing because they start paying out for uncovered losses just because someone hassles them.
He has hardly come here to ask our help to get something that he is not entitled to.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?