I think that's probably a tad unfair.
I'd say America just wasn't ready to have someone who had a dreadful track record on pretty much everything, hastily cobbled together policy positions and couldn't be let off the lead to face one on one serious Journalist interviews without fear she'd be shown up as the empty vessel she is/was.
She was frankly, an appalling candidate.
Between Harris and Trump there is only one appalling candidate.
Harris was a VP, a Senator, a DA. People voting for her would have got more of the responsible governance they got from Biden, who steadied things after Trump.
Trump's track record:
But they were ready for someone who incited a mob to overturn the result of the last election, a mob threatening to hang his own VP... someone found liable in court for assaulting Jean E Carroll? For using campaign funds to pay hush money to cover up his affair with Stormy Daniels - again, established in an open court of law?
One of whose main talking points in the campaign was spreading racist lies about immigrants eating pets, racebaiting which led to bomb threats to that community.
Trump had no serious policies, nonsense about the price of eggs he is now trying to distract people from with Greenland nonsense.
Have a look at some of his speeches where he talks about wind farms, and whether to be eaten by sharks or electrocuted by electric boats. Let off the lead? Some of the stuff he came out with was barking mad, but was sane washed by the media.
Says a lot if you're not appalled by that from Trump but are appalled by Harris.