Just a note, I had made an error in my original calculations (i had counted days to sep 2013 and not sep 2012, which has a different result on the annual rate of return). The correct figures are slightly worse for QL, but still very good.
I have edited my post above to have the correct info, but I will also repost it here for simplicity.
Total Index Return -15.438%, Annualised return -2.581%
QL total return -21.972%, Annualised return -3.795
The QL fund over this date range underperformed the index by about 1.2% per year in total. We can imagine an etf with a tracking cost of .2% and a quinn AMC on top of 1%.
I have edited my post above to have the correct info, but I will also repost it here for simplicity.
Total Index Return -15.438%, Annualised return -2.581%
QL total return -21.972%, Annualised return -3.795
The QL fund over this date range underperformed the index by about 1.2% per year in total. We can imagine an etf with a tracking cost of .2% and a quinn AMC on top of 1%.