Complainer
Registered User
- Messages
- 4,949
To play Devil's Advocate then; if we include VAT, then can we break that down on who is also contributing to the VAT take?
Proportionally do higher earners also spend more/buy higher value goods and so therefore contribute more to the VAT intake?
It would be very interesting to see a proper analysis of this, all right. Lower earners do tend to spend most/all of their income, so as a proportion of their income, they may well be paying more VAT. They are less likely to be buying Spanish/Bulgarian property or NASDAQ shares too.
It would be very interesting to see a proper analysis of this, all right. Lower earners do tend to spend most/all of their income, so as a proportion of their income, they may well be paying more VAT. They are less likely to be buying Spanish/Bulgarian property or NASDAQ shares too.
Very good point. But 'The Rich' are always to blame, because they are such a blurry easy target. Truth is, you can never take enough from 'The Rich'.The guy on €100k needs to respect people in less fortunate cirumstances, but equally (or more importantly) people in less fortunate circumstances need to respect that some people are giving up half their incomes to provide them with a safety net.
Very good point. But 'The Rich' are always to blame, because they are such a blurry easy target. Truth is, you can never take enough from 'The Rich'.
This thread was about VBs comment on income tax. But I would still fathom a guess that "the rich" contribute more in VAT than less well off. I bought a new car a few years ago, and I think that the total tax bill was €7,500. A neighbour of mine bought a very nice Mercedes CLS and I think his total tax bill was €40,000. Big difference for the same amount of road usage.You seem to forget that income tax is just one of the many taxes in place in Ireland today. VAT brings in more to the Govt than income tax. Everybody pays tax.
Even under a flat system you would have to have a certain tax free allowance so this isn't about getting all the lower paid workers into the tax net.
Yeah, in a very juvinile and satisfying way!PS Did anyone else have a giggle at the name of that PDF file?
The guy on €100k needs to respect people in less fortunate cirumstances, but equally (or more importantly) people in less fortunate circumstances need to respect that some people are giving up half their incomes to provide them with a safety net.
Always easy to scape goat a small group people.Very good point. But 'The Rich' are always to blame, because they are such a blurry easy target. Truth is, you can never take enough from 'The Rich'.
I object to it being called 'progressive'. 'Progressive' is the name given to this form of taxation by some very smart robber. So everyone associates this type of taxation with being forward looking, advancing, broad minded etc just because of word association.Anyway, I would rather have a progressive sales tax than a progressive income tax, as the former encourages saving and investment while the latter discourages earning. Topic for a whole new thread though.
I object to it being called 'progressive'. 'Progressive' is the name given to this form of taxation by some very smart robber. So everyone associates this type of taxation with being forward looking, advancing, broad minded etc just because of word association.
I object to it being called 'progressive'. 'Progressive' is the name given to this form of taxation by some very smart robber. So everyone associates this type of taxation with being forward looking, advancing, broad minded etc just because of word association.
progressively regressive? (I'll get my coat)
Something like that.
It's like calling it a bunnies, apple pie and nice things taxation system; who could be against that?
I have no problem at all with the idea of an progressive tax system. The marginal value of money declines the more you earn. For example, the last €50 earned for someone on €20,000 is a lot more important than the last €50 for someone earning a €100,000. That doesn't mean you should screw higher earners with more taxation but it is an important fact to remember when discussing tax systems. It's all very well saying everyone should pay the same tax on every cent they earn but the reality is different. It's why no Country that I am aware of has managed it. Any of the Baltic countries that I know of with a flat rate have tax free allowances and other structures in place to protect the lower paid.
The person on €20’000 gets to keep around €39 of their last €50 earned.
The person on €100’000 gets to keep around €22 of their last €50 earned.
It may be worth less to the person on €100’000 but is it worth half as much?
I find it strange that there is such resentment against the so-called super rich. If someone pay a million Euro a year in income tax (plus all that VAT) maybe they've paid enough? Maybe there should be a cap after which we say "you've paid your share, keep the rest".
But Sunny, how many people earn 1 million a year? I said on my first post that there could be some type of wealth tax on the super rich. However, I am not a high earner yet if I got a pay rise tomorrow, the government would see approx 60% of it. This does not make sense to me.
Your point re: the tax system in Baltic countries is interesting in that if we had a flat rate of tax here, maybe it could be balanced for the low paid by means testing things like child benefit, state pensions etc.
In other words, every pays the same rate of income tax but lower paid earners get help in areas like health and children through the welfare system.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?