I don't the reckon the sages are aware of how distorted the Irish rental market is.Friends.This is hardly a time to get out.Far from it.This is a time to get in.!!Check out all the investment sages advice over the last 100 years perhaps.In my humble opinion of course.
Thanks for the reply, I entered as an investment, my mortgage is low enough that I have a little profit after paying tax and mortgage, and then the lump sum of selling when I retire - ya cant go wrong..Debateable over a 15 year period. Its likely some more radical govt could emerge at some point OR the housing crisis just gets so severe property rights of owners are gutted to satisfy those wielding the loudest pitchforks. That said, rental income is a good pension supplement too. All of it boils down to why you entered in the first place, and for an awful lot of people who entered primarily for capital gains over long term rental income, its likely to have been a bumpy ride.
And the number of properties available for families to buy and live in has increased. Swings and roundabouts?Do ppl not see the government are making things worse, all these regs that are in favour of tenants just means the small landlords are selling up making the number of properties avail less and increasing rent.. do tenants not see this
I have seen a house absolutely wrecked because the tenants left their dogs in the house all day while they were in work. Dogs peeing on the floor, it going under the skirting boards, which between that and the chew marks meant they had to be replaced, along with all the scratch marks on doors and windows. The landlord of the property now won't rent the property for people with pets and actually had trouble renting it last time out as most people had a dog.
There's a shortage of new homes being built, and we're all here rearranging the shortfall between rental and buying with the swings and roundabouts.And the number of properties available for families to buy and live in has increased. Swings and roundabouts?
My point was that the net effect is zero and not negative as some people seem to think.There's a shortage of new homes being built, and we're all here rearranging the shortfall between rental and buying with the swings and roundabouts.
Sorry, I was agreeing with you. A first time buyer purchasing a house that was previously is one less household in the rental market, but one less property available for rent. Net effect of zero on the rental market.My point was that the net effect is zero and not negative as some people seem to think.
2 things thoughMy point was that the net effect is zero and not negative as some people seem to think.
It’s not in a dynamic context!My point was that the net effect is zero
It might indeed be a zero sum game ( I'm not sure long term ) but the smaller landlords, that can, are walking away for good.Sorry, I was agreeing with you. A first time buyer purchasing a house that was previously is one less household in the rental market, but one less property available for rent. Net effect of zero on the rental market.
Plus people living with parents or returing from Dubai with savings buy ex-rentals. No rental is freed up when that happens.One area where the zero sum argument falls down is where people moving abroad temporarily for work are now leaving their place empty, and there are various other scenarios where people would now rather leave a place empty (to get around RPZs for example) due to the highly skewed risks for landlords. We have temporary demand where people move here for a year or two for work and ideally this would be partially matched with temporary rentals of people moving abroad, but now you are taking these temporary rentals off the table so they will end up hogging rentals more suited to long term renters.
Tenants that have to leave when a small landlord sells are also going to be facing much higher rents, low rent controlled apartments are much less likely to appear on the market. If they are budget limited then there are less available units net for them, that isn't zero sum.
Not all sold rentals are bought by families, we have single people buying them too, the occupancy of rented versus owned houses is higher. For example, a 4 bedroom rented house might commonly have four single people sharing and it's sold to a couple that were renting a one bed apartment. The four evicted tenants can't move into the one bed - that isn't zero sum.
Disclosure: I am not a landlord! (anymore)