Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,684
This was presented to the FLAC Insolvency Conference in April 2012.
The slides are here. The speaker is a consumer rights lawyer.
The system is so extraordinarily generous, I am not sure that I understood it correctly. I don't know why any lender would provide mortgages in Greece.
I think it was introduced in 2010.
It's best illustrated by an example which comes from slide 9
total debt|€135,000 |to 6 banks
Value of apartment|€73,000|mortgage amount not given
First 4 years|€400 per month|paid proportionately to all creditors
Next 15 years|€62,050|paid to lender in equal instalmentsI got the impression that the €400 per month for the first four years was paid to the non-mortgage creditors, but this is a small point.
If the creditors don't agree, then the borrower can appeal to the court and apparently, there is a 3 year waiting period. However, the law has been changed so that the figures are backdated to when the debt write-off was applied for.
The scheme is not revised no matter what happens to the person's income over the coming years.
The big issue for consumers is to "time the application properly". As house prices are expected to fall, they may end up paying less if they wait another year or so to apply for the scheme.
One of the justifications for the scheme is
The slides are here. The speaker is a consumer rights lawyer.
The system is so extraordinarily generous, I am not sure that I understood it correctly. I don't know why any lender would provide mortgages in Greece.
I think it was introduced in 2010.
It's best illustrated by an example which comes from slide 9
Value of apartment|€73,000|mortgage amount not given
First 4 years|€400 per month|paid proportionately to all creditors
Next 15 years|€62,050|paid to lender in equal instalments
If the creditors don't agree, then the borrower can appeal to the court and apparently, there is a 3 year waiting period. However, the law has been changed so that the figures are backdated to when the debt write-off was applied for.
The scheme is not revised no matter what happens to the person's income over the coming years.
The big issue for consumers is to "time the application properly". As house prices are expected to fall, they may end up paying less if they wait another year or so to apply for the scheme.
One of the justifications for the scheme is
which, I think, means that it is a better alternative than to reduce all outstanding mortgages by, say, 30%.Beneficial to credit institutions as it prevents an horizontal haircut and focuses on case-specific circumstances