Sunday Times article: The whole of Europe is delusionally living beyond its means

MrEarl said:
Very true...

The simple fact of the matter is that our county is on track to blow the entire Apple Money, plus the money put away into the ISIF, on one simple thing - fines (for not hitting our 2030 targets).
Click to expand...
Fines from whom exactly?

There is no binding commitment anywhere for such nonsense.
 
In days of old, journalists had virtually no control over their pieces headline.

I assume its pretty much the same now?

I sometimes find myself being hooked by a headline and giving up half way through the article when it shows little or no relevance to the title.
 
Last edited:
No wonder the RTE article reads so woolly. The assertions in the original source document (page 31) produced by the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council, are dreadfully weak. I've bolded the weak bits.

 
charlie007 said:
In days of old, journalists had virtually no control over their pieces headline.

I assume its pretty much the same now?
Click to expand...
This. Headlines are added by subeditors after the journalist has filed the copy.

Subeditors always worked under pressure of time but, these days, in the world of instant online publishing, the pressure is intense to post a story before a competitor does. Plus, most media organisations have greatly reduced revenues, so they employ fewer staff — including fewer subeditors. So subeditors regularly write headlines for stories that they haven't had time to read all they way through, much less understand.

(And that's before we think about the parallel set of pressures that incentivise a sensational, clickbaity headline.)
 
T McGibney said:
All I see there is a headline. You'll have to be a lot more specific than that, especially as the Fiscal Council report doesn't make any mention of binding EU targets backed by any system of fines.
Click to expand...
Perhaps scroll down and read a little more. Current targets are set out here. Not so much fines as credits will have to be purchased if targets are missed, supply / demand for credits will influence cost which is why projections are used.
 
Leo said:
Perhaps scroll down and read a little more. Current targets are set out here. Not so much fines as credits will have to be purchased if targets are missed, supply / demand for credits will influence cost which is why projections are used.
Click to expand...
Thanks, that explains all the if's but's and maybe's in the IFAC report.
 
bill_cash said:
Climate change reporting is full of hysterical media inflated sensationalism.
Click to expand...
And fact and data and scientific conclusions and projections based on that date and those conclusions.
bill_cash said:
The climate will change to some degree,
Click to expand...
We all agree on that, well most of us anyway. There are still some people who are wilfully ignoring the facts and the data.
bill_cash said:
we will adapt and governments will fudge the fines or commit electoral suicide if they pay them
Click to expand...
We will indeed adapt. It is the level of adaption needed and the economic and political consequences of that adaptation, and the economic and human devastation, that are of concern.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register