galway_blow_in
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,020
Listening to Paul Somerfield in the radio few moments ago was scary.
that guy has been a bear forever
Listening to Paul Somerfield in the radio few moments ago was scary.
that guy has been a bear forever
I’m up a lot of money about 30-40% since 2014 , all these doomsdayers eventually they might be right and and it crashes 25% in a day but I’ll still be up, don’t listen to noise and trash talk just buy and hold and believe in the markets.
Is it?A 25% drop is massive
Is it?
It's certainly not in the least bit unusual for equities to correct by 20% or more - historically the S&P500 has suffered a 20%+ pull back roughly once every 3.5 years on average.
Decumulating retirees would be well advised to allocate their savings so they don't find themselves having to crystallise losses due to short-term market fluctuations. All equity investments should be long-term.
Listening to Paul Somerfield in the radio few moments ago was scary.
I see the S&P500 had its best day yesterday since November 2016...
Since the stock market began, stocks rise and fall. Markets correct, recover, correct, recover. That's the economic cycle. We often lose sight of this due to the volume of white noise and so called experts out there. Then fear and emotion kick in with our decision making. When Trump gleefully announced in a recent interview that the stock market was at its highest level ever, I sighed. Its not an everlasting gobstopper for Gods sake! Growth is not infinite. Best to look back historically at all the corrections, speed bumps and downturns in the stock market.....and we are still here. I suppose the key is to be diversified, different asset classes etc and not bet on one horse essentially.
Paul Sommerville's "Panic now, as it's cheaper than panicking later."
I usually treat someone commenting on the stock market on the radio / TV as a vested interest that can and should be ignored.
99% of stock market reporting is simply click-bait or just white noise. As much as is being made out the recent 'correction', the media tend to overdo the 'rally'.
Its the 24/7 news cycle, got to keep the punters on board.
I usually treat someone commenting on the stock market on the radio / TV as a vested interest that can and should be ignored.
i actually agree with sarenco about a 25% pullback not being a disaster , when it happened in 1987 , it took two years to recover but that was after a big rise from 1982 , the 50% plus drop in 2008 - early 2009 was a massive deal however , not only did it take more than twice as long to recover , its not like the market prior to crash had had a strong run , it was still no higher than in the year 2000 , the situation was even worse for those exclusively invested in europe ( germany being the exception ) who have now not seen any real worthwhile gains in decades and who would have been better putting there money in a savings account at the start of this century , lot of stress avoided
On the face of it, if you have 40% gains followed by 25% pull-back of course its no big deal (allowing for inflation over the period of investment and relative to returns on other investments outside the stock market).
I was thinking more in terms as to why there is a pull-back at all. If markets continue on a downward trajectory for a sustained period it indicates all is not well in the wider economy. The recent ‘correction’, to me, implies nothing more than an interpretation of news. That interpretation may subsequently prove to be justified or unjustified. A stock market that continues on a downward trajectory over a sustained period indicates to me wider fundamental issues in the economy.
Personally I think stock markets are, in no insignificant amount, propped up by cheap money. This correction appears to have occurred on the news that wages growth has returned. Personally I would, at this juncture, interpret that as a positive.