aircobra19
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,733
True, as you "imagined", it "could" be worth more. But to balance that out, I'm imagining that it could also be worth less. And given that we are now at the tail end of the largest property boom that this country has ever had, would you not agree that the highest premium this type of property will reach is to be found at the moment (and that's even if I imagine that it's price hasn't dropped in the last 12 months)?
what are the current offers on the house? if you can't stand the hassle of being a landlord then sell it, simple as, and just accept the highest offer. problem solved.
I suspect you have very little exposure to, or experience in, finance. The facts, which are indisputable are as follows:
Add on top of this the OP declaration that they don't want to be a landlord (read this to mean it is highly unlikely that they can run this as profitably as an investment as it should be to justify its price) and this screams out to be sold at the earliest possible point in order to reduce what at the moment is:
- This is current a dead asset, sitting there.
- It has an unknown current price in the market
- Within the range of prices at which a sale would be coneivable at present the yield is less than cash and even more less than sovereign bonds (i.e. less than a risk free rate)
- The yield on this property (or conceivable range) is far below long term averages
- Relative asset prices in residential property are far above long term averages
- Unwanted risk
- Uncompensated risk
It is literally costing you more than €1,000 every week you wait. Even if you rent it at current yields you will in effect be losing money.
Assuming the property is not being rented as it is for sale.
Take 90% of the current asking price as a more likely current market value. Deposit rates on this sum c. 4%. Opportunity cost is lost interest of c €1,000 per week (after DIRT).
the OP states in the thread title that she is 'still unable' to sell house. this is not true, she is unwilling to sell the house at the price offered. these posts have been going on for 2 years. the OP is stressed about being a landlord yet won't take the simple step of agreeing a price on the house, she has mentioned previously cash flow problems etc all this will be solved by selling the house, i would be fairly certain that the price being offered now is significantly less than would have been offered 2 years ago.
there's only so much advice that can be given to someone that won't listen. it must be borne in mind there is no mortgage outstanding on the property and from previous threads maintenance costs are significant and likely to reappear.
so get rid of the house!
A gross yield less than the cost of capital.
When astute investing allows you to pack in the day job at 38, like I did, come back and talk to me about finance.
Astute investing allowed me to pack in the day job at 37, so obviously that makes me right on this issue.
In the poster words:So no more renting after June, as tenant's lease is up
To have a sum of capital sitting around doing nothing. It is called "out of the market", whatever market that might be.
A question for you. Do you know what "cost of carry" is?
A gross yield less than the cost of capital
Simply fact. Unless rental yield is more than about 5% presently, this is costing the owner money.
I just try and provide the benefit of some of my training and professional experience for people at risk of getting dodgy advice from strangers on the interwebby
A period house in D4 with a rental stream is a dead asset.
You are losing 52k a year holding this property.
Bonds are risk free.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?