ubiquitous
Registered User
- Messages
- 3,782
I presume that this is how parties are funded from Exchequer funds? If it was such funds that eventually made their way into the party leader's fund and which were misused then it would seem a bit of a long stretch to categorise this as misappropriation of public funds.TarfHead said:Himself and Tom McGurk had a 'ding dong do' on Dunphy's programme this morning, but it's not on the podcast. If I heard him correctly, and my mind tends to wander when he's pontificating, that was his assertion - namely that the party leader's account is centrally/publicly funded.
Long stretches are his bread and butter.ClubMan said:I presume that If it was such funds that eventually made their way into the party leader's fund and which were misused then it would seem a bit of a long stretch to categorise this as misappropriation of public funds.
Party leader funds are generally from party donations, the allowance is then for the leader to do with as he saw fit - in CJ's case that was to uphold his dapper image, which is fair enough.I presume that this is how parties are funded from Exchequer funds? If it was such funds that eventually made their way into the party leader's fund and which were misused then it would seem a bit of a long stretch to categorise this as misappropriation of public funds.
jem said:I for one will be proud to sit and watch the Funeral and will be sending a mass card to his family.
Presumably the grass roots non-dubs - his words apparently.Who were the 'mountainy men'??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?