for some reason i cant enter a thread in letting off steam. Anyway i had a "heated" debate with a friend in a pub last night about the smoking ban. it was 1.00 in the morning and the barman put ashtrays on the counter and to our amazement a lot of the customers lit up. this started us talking about the smoking ban. basically what he was saying was that the law states that there is no smoking allowed in the workplace. i agreed with him. i should state that we are both non smokers. the discussion got really heated however when i disagreed with the way the ban was introduced. my opinion is that publicans should have been given the option of declaring a pub smoking or non smoking. Customers would then be able to decide what pub they would go to. my whole argument was that it is a persons right to smoke or not to smoke. the government should not be able to dictate to people were they can and cant smoke. By introducing the smoking ban has this not taken away form peoples civil liberties? this debate will continue with my friend and i think that we will have to agree to disagree. as previously stated i am a non smoker. i should also state that i have no link to any pub. i would appreciate peoples thoughts on this.