Should your partner be present at the birth of your child??

N

ney001

Registered User
Messages
803
Debate on the radio today, should your partner be present at the birth of your child?. I was actually talking to my sil about this at the weekend. She is due a baby soon & is adamant that he is present, even though he doesn't feel that he will be much use, of course he will be there for her but realistically speaking he feels that her mother would be more of a comfort for her. For me to be honest I think my other half would probably be present at the birth but I don't think he would be any good, I can imagine him going to pieces and fainting, he can't watch anything with blood/operations etc on tv - I could just see me comforting and looking after him!

The other aspect is that a lot of men stated that it was difficult to 'fancy' their partners etc have witnessed them give birth and therefore sex drive when waaaay down??

So should men be there or not?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-559913/A-obstetrician-men-NEVER-birth-child.html
 
Must ask my OH about this, if I were giving birth Id like him to be there, but only at the top end of my body - leave the rest of it to the doctors!!
 
The obstetrician in the article makes some very valid points I have to say most notably the fact that the adrenalin pumping through the partner's body makes it impossible for the woman to relax etc. Realistically I think my OH would be there mainly because it's the done thing now, because all of our friends husbands etc have been present. I think for him, if he could walk in a minute after baby was delivered he'd be happy as a clam. For me, I think I would find my mam more useful and practical then my OH.

Maybe I'll just stick with my cats and dogs so! :D
 
ney001 said:
For me, I think I would find my mam more useful and practical then my OH.
Click to expand...

I think Id like my best friend there AND my OH but she would be under instruction to punch my OH for every pain I experienced - seeing as Id be too busy to deliver the blows myself :D
 
The consultant makes a cogent argument.

I am sure there are some couples for whom the presence of the father at birth is a wholly joyous experience ( as indeed was the case with my kids).

Unfortunately, it has become such an orthodoxy that both mother and father now seem to have little real choice.

A prospective father will be reluctant to do anything other than bow to the wishes of his wife\partner. Labour is not the time for the voicing of the Male View.

She will be repeatedly told that his presence is normal and beneficial and she will not want to deviate from the norm. There is no real questioning of this.

We will never return to the day when a father deposited his in-labour partner at the hospital and went on to work. But perhaps we might get around to a situation where we have the father under starter's orders outside the door ( or maybe there for the early stages of labour), with his presence required only if specifically called for..
 
been at both mine, its not such an ordeal. Your role mainly involves moving bags, talking to herself, getting a drink of water etc.

I think it would be a pity not to be there, also good to have a 2nd person keeping an eye on charts, times, etc etc. but granted that could be the mom.

Hope ye are not straying into the "all men are helpless/useless" stereotype, give them a chance and they might surprise ye.
 
Having gone through it I do think its important for the partner to be there at the birth. Its an unusual medical experience and can be quite scary and long - having your partner there for support removes some of the scare factor.

Also some times there are medical decisions to be made or birth plans to be stuck to or indeed thrown out (in my case) and your partner may wish to be privvy to that.

I will admit it seemed to me at the time that my partner was about as useful as the cat in there, however in retrospect he was very helpful. Im glad he was there and he^s glad he was there.

By the way, he stayed up above the shoulder area but still got covered in blood at one stage. Sorry if that ruins anyones afternoon cup of tea.
 
Last edited:
So not only do you want him to be present at the conception you want him there at the birth too :)
 
Betsy Og said:
Hope ye are not straying into the "all men are helpless/useless" stereotype, give them a chance and they might surprise ye.
Click to expand...

Not at all, however what the article appears to be saying is that generally speaking the woman is better off on her own altogether i.e no partner at all, she can then relax into it herself!

I think if my oh was there he would be about as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike, that said he would be company if there was a lot of waiting around. My own dad wasn't allowed to be present for the first two kids as the nuns made him wait in the waiting room, he was quite angered by this at the time as was my mam because she had nobody to speak up for her and was stuck with two horrible nuns ordering her about!. He was allowed in for the third which was a lot later on and he reckons it was the best experience of his life! - makes him resent even further not being there for the first two! -

I just feel that a lot of men are forced in to the delivery as it is the done thing!
 
Only been to one (so far), it was a long day (16 hours from 9am), so long that Mrs Sox kicked me out at one stage to have lunch and read the paper. Having said that, I know she was glad to have me there, firstly to have someone to talk to as the day passed, secondly as her servant, and thirdly to take the mickey out of me afterwards for some of the sh..e I was talking at the end. "Push, nearly there, etc etc etc. I think she also felt that bit more secure having someone she knew there with her, in particuler when she noticed the nurse warming the babygrow on the radiator and realising just how small it was

Best day of my life without a shadow of a doubt and sitting there holding my little girl whilst the very nice doctors and nurses finished up with my wife was just the greatest most awesome 20 minutes any man could ever have
 
Am I missing something here? Isn't the man's child too ( well one would presume ).

Is a birth some horrible experience that men should be excused from? And even if it is horrible, and, no doubt, some of them are, why should they be excused from it? Is it to spare their frail little sensibilities?
 
ney001 said:
. My own dad wasn't allowed to be present for the first two kids as the nuns made him wait in the waiting room, he was quite angered by this at the time as was my mam because she had nobody to speak up for her and was stuck with two horrible nuns ordering her about!.
Click to expand...

Thats why the consultants don't want the dad about. It makes it easier to intimidate the mum into doing what they want.

I loved having my husband there, he was a great support and was on hand in case anything happened that needed immediate decision for me or the baby. I would not trust anyone else with that and nor would he. My mum does not believe people need epidurals so she would be no help!
 
Vanilla said:
Am I missing something here? Isn't the man's child too ( well one would presume ).

Is a birth some horrible experience that men should be excused from? And even if it is horrible, and, no doubt, some of them are, why should they be excused from it? Is it to spare their frail little sensibilities?
Click to expand...

I don't think this is the argument being made by the consultant in the article. Not that I agree with his rather rigid views either - having husband at birth has worked fine in my family and with all siblings.

I think that a man at a childbirth is expected to do what whatever he is told by the mother;

Point is, as a mother you don't really get a choice either; as a mother you are expected to want the father there - so you tend to go along with it without really questioning it;
 
MOB said:
Point is, as a mother you don't really get a choice either; as a mother you are expected to want the father there - so you tend to go along with it without really questioning it;
Click to expand...

Does this touch on the point of whether a father has a right to be there, or should it be just at the whim of the mother?

I'd have thought they have a right to be there, whether they exercise it or not - presumably its something you agree on well in advance but I think it would be insensitive to stop a father from being there if that was their preference.
 
Mother's whim. Though it is unfair to call it a whim. But if there is ever a time when a woman should be entitled to dictate terms, it is during childbirth.

Frankly, if a husband\partner is 'asked' to stand on his head for the duration, he should probably do so - at least until he passes out.
 
MOB said:
at least until he passes out.
Click to expand...

Which is one of the reasons why the medical profession prefer for any squeamish fathers not to be there. A midwife friend told me many years ago that they have to fill in an accident report form if the father collapses and he can sometimes require more attention than the mother.
 
...when Mrs Daithi gave birth to our 2nd child, I was in the throes of the flu (the real one,not the manflu as described by Nick Frost) and had a mouthful of ulcers which made it nearly impossible for the to talk coherently..I was present for the birth and my wife turned to me and asked if I was all right!! You sould have seen the filthy looks i got from the midwife!!:p


daithi
 
MOB said:
Mother's whim. Though it is unfair to call it a whim. But if there is ever a time when a woman should be entitled to dictate terms, it is during childbirth.

Frankly, if a husband\partner is 'asked' to stand on his head for the duration, he should probably do so - at least until he passes out.
Click to expand...

+1. I kicked my partner out, and had my mother in instead - she was much more helpful. Partner was useless, starting arguments with me about any request I made .....baby was in distress so we were both stressed. Mind you, he was awfully resentful about me preferring my mother's presence.... split up shortly after.
 
Gordanus said:
+1. I kicked my partner out, and had my mother in instead - she was much more helpful. Partner was useless, starting arguments with me about any request I made .....baby was in distress so we were both stressed. Mind you, he was awfully resentful about me preferring my mother's presence.... split up shortly after.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you're better off! :D

Re my original post - my SIL baby was born and I spoke to himself straight afterwards he was absolutely stunned with the whole thing - wouldn't have missed it for the world and according to her he was incredibly useful throughout - making her laugh, telling her jokes, distracting her so different strokes for different folks I guess!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top