I have to say I found that analysis particularly useful.
With respect, far more useful that your analyses involving yields, which as we have discussed elsewhere, really add very little to the discussion.
Brendan
Well, with respect, I disagree!
If the projected net yield on a property is less than the cost of financing that property then the rate of return on that property is negative, before you even take tax into account - your own figures show that. There is really nothing magical about it and net yield is the standard way that professional investors express the return on a property. The net yield figure is easy to calculate and can be applied universally. You can certainly work up a pro-forma set out accounts if you like but you're inevitably making certain assumptions about an individual's tax position.
You can also extrapolate forward into the future if you want but you have to assume that rents, property values and mortgage rates remain constant. My only point is that the further into the future you go, the more these assumptions start to look "stretched". In my opinion, it is more meaningful to simply look at the projected net yield and the cost of finance today as the basis for making a decision rather than assuming that the various factors that feed into these figures will remain constant into the future.
Hopefully we can agree that trying to predict future property values, interest rates or rents is guess work at best.