T McGibney
Registered User
- Messages
- 7,361
In early 2022, a landlord registers a residential tenancy with the RTB and pays €90 to register the tenancy for the shorter of its duration or 4 years.
In April 2022, legislation is enacted to unilaterally shorten the registration period to one year.
In early 2023, the landlord is advised by the RTB that their registration has now expired and that they must pay €40 to renew it.
They have not consented to the shortening of their earlier registration, for which they paid €90 in good faith. They ask the RTB why they're not entitled to a refund of or credit for the difference of €50 which they overpaid last year for what was effectively a single year's registration. They get no satisfactory answer.
They ask me for advice. I tell them that the State makes its own rules on matters like this and that we generally have no option but to put up with it. They remind me that if a private company did the same thing, for example in shortening the term of an insurance or service contract, they would at the very least be expected to reimburse the customer for the unused portion of the original fee. Failure to do that or to compensate them for the lost service would constitute a breach of contract on the company's part. I have no answer to that.
Am I missing something? All feedback is welcome.
In April 2022, legislation is enacted to unilaterally shorten the registration period to one year.
In early 2023, the landlord is advised by the RTB that their registration has now expired and that they must pay €40 to renew it.
They have not consented to the shortening of their earlier registration, for which they paid €90 in good faith. They ask the RTB why they're not entitled to a refund of or credit for the difference of €50 which they overpaid last year for what was effectively a single year's registration. They get no satisfactory answer.
They ask me for advice. I tell them that the State makes its own rules on matters like this and that we generally have no option but to put up with it. They remind me that if a private company did the same thing, for example in shortening the term of an insurance or service contract, they would at the very least be expected to reimburse the customer for the unused portion of the original fee. Failure to do that or to compensate them for the lost service would constitute a breach of contract on the company's part. I have no answer to that.
Am I missing something? All feedback is welcome.