MissRibena
Registered User
- Messages
- 350
Maybe you are right and the crude PR stunt will work out far better than (say) 100,000 signatures to a petition. My point was that Eddie had a captive audience in half a million viewers and I think he could have chosen his mode of protest better to maximise the response.
I don't object to Eddie looking to get a majority motivated by targetting working class/low income/less educated/non-middle/upper class people (or whoever Ronan means) by simplyfing arguments to be succinct. That's fine by me. By all means get the Sun or the Mirror and as many tabloids and broadsheets you can behind your campaign (like the Iraq war protests in the UK) but make an intelligent point intelligently by appealing to as many as you can. If the ratio of viewers to activists in this case is right and the AAM senders are representative, then Eddie has failed to motivate his target audience, no matter how you look at it.
If you guys are right though, does that not just raise more questions. If it's just a matter of a few people making an outrageous or comical statement/gesture to make change happen, rather than a well-constructed large-scale protest, where are we headed in a democracy? Although, given our government you can find yourself in depressing territory if you start examining the state of democracy here (something closer to my heart than the rip-off stuff).
Maybe only 700 nappies were sent because rather than being apathetic, most people just don't "feel" that ripped-off.
Rebecca
I don't object to Eddie looking to get a majority motivated by targetting working class/low income/less educated/non-middle/upper class people (or whoever Ronan means) by simplyfing arguments to be succinct. That's fine by me. By all means get the Sun or the Mirror and as many tabloids and broadsheets you can behind your campaign (like the Iraq war protests in the UK) but make an intelligent point intelligently by appealing to as many as you can. If the ratio of viewers to activists in this case is right and the AAM senders are representative, then Eddie has failed to motivate his target audience, no matter how you look at it.
If you guys are right though, does that not just raise more questions. If it's just a matter of a few people making an outrageous or comical statement/gesture to make change happen, rather than a well-constructed large-scale protest, where are we headed in a democracy? Although, given our government you can find yourself in depressing territory if you start examining the state of democracy here (something closer to my heart than the rip-off stuff).
Maybe only 700 nappies were sent because rather than being apathetic, most people just don't "feel" that ripped-off.
Rebecca