A 2% increase on annual rent almost anywhere in the country would easily be €500?
Are annual rents really running at an average of €25,000?
A 2% increase on annual rent almost anywhere in the country would easily be €500?
So anyone in digs, rent a room out of luck. Would argue these people would often be the hardest pressed income wise.according to link posted by Sunny (and as I guessed myself) - "and the landlord must be registered with the Residential Tenancies Board (RTB)"
if you are renting rooms shared in your home, you don't need to register with RTB
Are annual rents really running at an average of €25,000?
I am renting a place while building a home. Very average 3 bed in North County Dublin. €2200 per month or over €26k a year.....
Hasn't their regulation and monitoring done enough harm everywhere else?You would have though they would do something to regulate and monitor compliance in the rent a room sector. Some landlords letting full homes, not residing and getting a lot of tax free income. They can also up the rent as they are not controlled.
is there any evidence this is actually happening?landlords letting full homes, not residing and getting a lot of tax free income
I will agree with you there. I meant effective regulation.Hasn't their regulation and monitoring done enough harm everywhere else?
The problem is that it is all too effective.I will agree with you there. I meant effective regulation.
There was a recent post on another forum. Poster wanted to get licencee out of his PPR to give room a relative. Stated he lived elsewhere in Ireland and had not lived in the house for years. However, they kept a mattress in a room, somewhere in the house (that was not a bedroom) so they could stay there if they wanted. House had 4 beds and there was at least 4 people there. Owner claimed to be fair on rent, only 800 a room, but could charge more. That's over 30k a year. No way owner is registered as they were insisting it was their PPR, completely ignoring that to avail of rent a room, you must live there.is there any evidence this is actually happening?
I suspect, what's more likely is that owners are getting a lot more than 14k a year. €700/800 for a room in a house share is not unheard of these days.
I am lost. Effective regulation would be fit for purpose and implement/managed etc. A lot of our regulation is not fit for purpose and therefoe ineffective. Or am I on the wrong page altogether?The problem is that it is all too effective.
There's no reason in the world why Revenue, armed with suitable land registry, household electricity usage and electoral registers data, won't pick off these guys like daisies when the time is right and the interest bill is sufficiently high to make it worth their while.There was a recent post on another forum. Poster wanted to get licencee out of his PPR to give room a relative. Stated he lived elsewhere in Ireland and had not lived in the house for years. However, they kept a mattress in a room, somewhere in the house (that was not a bedroom) so they could stay there if they wanted. House had 4 beds and there was at least 4 people there. Owner claimed to be fair on rent, only 800 a room, but could charge more. That's over 30k a year. No way owner is registered as they were insisting it was their PPR and normal place of registration.
This is one case, but there are more. How do you measure what is not measurable, known etc.
I have no issue with Rent-a-Room, but wonder whether it should still be tax free. Its not earned income and why should it not be taxable?
The abolition of bedsits is an apt example of effective regulation. It achieved its purpose.I am lost. Effective regulation would be fit for purpose and implement/managed etc. A lot of our regulation is not fit for purpose and therefoe ineffective. Or am I on the wrong page altogether?
Are these not coming back under the guise of Rent-a-Room with houses of multiple occupation? ?You hear about properties where the living room is now a bed room.The abolition of bedsits is an apt example of effective regulation. It achieved its purpose.
Are they? (Only a tiny subset of residential properties avail of the Rent-a-Room scheme, which anecdotally is a lot more popular now, than was the case a decade or so ago when bedsits were abolished.)Are these not coming back under the guise of Rent-a-Room with houses of multiple occupation? ?You hear about properties where the living room is now a bed room.
There have been plenty of media reports of shared rooms, rooms with bunk beds etc. I dont know the stats on Rent-a-Room, but the concept of house shares and rooms for rent is quite common. Some may be fully let to one person who then sublets. Impossible to measure.Are they? (Only a tiny subset of residential properties avail of the Rent-a-Room scheme, which anecdotally is a lot more popular than was the case a decade or so ago when bedsits were abolished.)
And the people who previously lived in them?
Because accommodation is scarce enough as it is?There have been plenty of media reports of shared rooms, rooms with bunk beds etc. I dont know the stats on Rent-a-Room, but the concept of house shares and rooms for rent is quite common. Some may be fully let to one person who then sublets. Impossible to measure.
I know all is borne from a chronic shortage of private accommodation. The rent-a-room relief stands out as being quite generous. 14k tax free is a lot of money. I still don't understand why it's not taxable. Its pretty unique in that context.
Imposing fines is neither here nor there compared to what they extract in typical arrears, interest and penalty cases.I know Revenue have the power to go back and impose fines in cases of non-compliance/evasion. Maybe/hopefully they will.
As long as the tenant in question has the permission of the owner and the property is their primary residence, this is legitimate and the €14k is tax free.Some may be fully let to one person who then sublets.