Henny Penny
Registered User
- Messages
- 559
32.—Leave to appeal shall be granted by the Court of Criminal Appeal in cases where the court is of opinion that a question of law is involved, or where the trial appears to the court to have been unsatisfactory, or there appears to the court to be any other sufficient ground of appeal, and the court shall have power to make all consequential orders it may think fit, including an order admitting the appellant to bail pending the determination of his appeal.
As I understand it, his legal team will have to go to the Court of Appeal to "appeal the right to appeal" if you get what I mean.......
ah that makes sense. Good letter in the paper today saying all the criminals will now send their phones elsewhere while they commit crimes to give themselves an alibi they can back up!
I believe he would have had to remove the battery to avoid being traced.If he had switched off his mobile phone on the morning in question, he would almost certainly have got away with the dastardly deed.
I believe he would have had to remove the battery to avoid being traced.
Not as far as I know. Once it's off it's not communicating with anything so cannot be traced via cell/mast records.I believe he would have had to remove the battery to avoid being traced.
Or maybe they'll just use pay as you go (until they bring in mandatory registration - will that be done retrospectively?!?) or nick somebody else's phone.ah that makes sense. Good letter in the paper today saying all the criminals will now send their phones elsewhere while they commit crimes to give themselves an alibi they can back up!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?