OECD 2015 says 3.2 per 1,000We have 2.7 doctors per 1000 people.
OECD 2014 says 11.9 per 1,000We have 12.4 nurses per 1000 people.
8th highest per capita spend (US$ value) in the OECD 2014Why is the fact that we have the second highest spend per head in the OECD
I am. Go to OECD and see the latest numbers https://data.oecd.org/healthres/health-spending.htm#indicator-chart You can sort and customise by clicking on column headings etc. Really smart user interface excellent site.Not sure who is right
I don't believe so. If things continue there will be no more HSE. Mary Harney set it up as a catch-fence between the politicians and the health system, but stuff is now leaking through the fence to the politicos. That cannot continue. Privatisation is next and is already happening. Trumpism (extreme Thatcherism) is alive and well in Ireland.
Mathepac is correct. I was looking at old data.Not sure who is right between Mathepac and Purple, but my takeaway from the figures is that you can't pin the issues in the health service on the lack of money going into it...
I want a well run and efficient publicly funded healthcare system which puts the interests of the public ahead of the interests of the people employed to deliver it. You needn't worry, the two faced, lying and duplicitous Unions, the incompetent (and unionised) Management and the parish-pump politicians who want a hospital in every town in Ireland will ensure the current shambles lumbers on and people keep tying on trolleys.. . . be careful what you wish for . . . you'll get it shortly . . .
It has no interest in improving the health service. He is interested in getting as much money as possible for as little work as possible for his members. If he is seeking to improve the health service he's not doing his job. If he is doing his job he is more likely than not damaging the health service and the country as a whole. The same can be said for all Unions and Union leaders.I wonder if Liam Doran has ever come up with a cost neutral improvement to the health service?
We have 12.4 nurses per 1000 people. The OECD average is 9.1 per 1000. How come we have a shortage of nurses? Could it be that we have enough nurses but we aren't using them properly?
It has no interest in improving the health service. He is interested in getting as much money as possible for as little work as possible for his members. If he is seeking to improve the health service he's not doing his job. If he is doing his job he is more likely than not damaging the health service and the country as a whole. The same can be said for all Unions and Union leaders.
An efficient health system would mean the same or fewer nurses and a better organised and run service would mean less stress and so more people would be willing to work there. That would mean less pressure for pay increases. Liam is running a business. His business is called the INMO. It makes money by getting members to pay a membership. It runs directly against his interests to have a efficient and well run healthcare system which is patient focused.I agree that he has no interest... but disagree that it's part of his job. He's constantly bleating about not just the pay but the conditions and stress etc etc of his members working in these hospitals. I am sure his members would want him to help tackle those issues too. Yet he never seems to come up with a positive cost-neutral suggestion to improve their day to day working conditions and remove stress and friction ... every problem comes to him with the same solution, a bigger pork barrel.
The numbers I posted relate to absenteeism, as only 87% is certified sick-leave. This may seem a minor point but the HSEs have a target of 100% certified sick leave. just making progress towards this goal alone could save millions as they get paid for not working plus the potential cost of an agency replacement.Liam Doran should be ashamed of himself. Cutting sick leave alone would make a massive difference.
Just as paper doesn't refuse ink doctors don't refuse money so if a nurse goes to their GP and looks for a sick cert they are going to get one, whether they need it or not. The real question is why nurses take so much sick leave. It doesn't matter whether it's certified or not. The notion that all certified sick leave is legitimate is nonsense. Doctors don't want to lose customers and even if they are completely ethical about giving out certs they still base their diagnosis on what the patient tells then. It isn't Star Trek, they don't have a Tricorder.The numbers I posted relate to absenteeism, as only 87% is certified sick-leave. This may seem a minor point but the HSEs have a target of 100% certified sick leave. just making progress towards this goal alone could save millions as they get paid for not working plus the potential cost of an agency replacement.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?