T McGibney
Registered User
- Messages
- 6,964
Is that because the driver drives the bus slowly? Should he drive it as if he were driving a car? Do car drivers have to stop to drop off and take on passengers along the route? Could that have something to do with it?
I haven't labelled anyone as "the bad guys". BE staff have tolerated the obvious nonsense on the 109 route for years. They have never taken any sort of stand about it. I conclude on that basis that they don't care a fiddlers about their passengers. You are free to conclude differently if the mood takes you.So now if public sector workers don't take a stand they are the bad guys too? A bit of damned if you do damned if you don't?
There is a different attitude to public/private sector worker's when things go wrong.
Ryanair works to maximize profit for its owner. The Bus Eireann 109 service works to maximize state subsidy for Bus Eireann.My point is that broadly speaking, there is little difference between either save, one works to maximize profit for their owner, the other works to provide a service.
Yes it is. But my interpretation of that is that you think the bus should drive direct from Cavan to Dublin without picking up commuters?You've accidentally hit the nail on the head. Bus Eireann have labelled the 80-mile trip from Cavan to Dublin as local service bus in order to attract state subsidy. For that reason it avoids the motorway to trundle through a series of towns in Co. Meath, all of which have alternative Bus Eireann services.
And it means that commuters and others have to endure innumerate stops along the route, both in towns and villages and at random points along the road.
Equivalent-length journeys to and from Dublin are generally classed as Expressways which don't attract subsidy.
But that's all a side issue to what we're discussing here.
I haven't labelled anyone as "the bad guys". BE staff have tolerated the obvious nonsense on the 109 route for years. They have never taken any sort of stand about it. I conclude on that basis that they don't care a fiddlers about their passengers. You are free to conclude differently if the mood takes you.
Except the BE staff didn't take a stand as they don't care a fiddlers about their passengers
There sure is. In the private sector, workers can get sacked or otherwise lose their jobs as a result of their own and their employers' respective underperformance. That doesn't happen in the public sector.
Yes it is. But my interpretation of that is that you think the bus should drive direct from Cavan to Dublin without picking up commuters?
Thank you.Sorry, that is correct, you haven't labelled anyone as "bad guys"
It's hardly complimentary to suggest that bus company workers "don't care a fiddlers about their passengers"which is, aside from being completely subjective, it is also so complimentary!
Has anyone been sacked in Ryanair? Will anyone get sacked in Ryanair?
They sack people all the time.
This is sad to hear, I thought it was a great company. Now it sounds like it must be an awful place to work. Why would they be sacking people all the time? Are you sure of this?
I'd say its a very tough and unforgiving place to work
Are you sure they 'sack people all the time?'
At tad exaggerated there I think!Dublin Bus lets me rot at the side of the road
Compensation that airlines are forced to pay out come by way of European directives if I'm not mistaken, not out of the goodness of airline generosity. I would be all for all public transport companies being compelled to do the same.Usually with no compensation whatsoever
So you have an alternative? More expensive, for sure, but ditto if your flight gets cancelled and you have to get somewhere (like home for instance).when I have no choice but to find a taxi as the alternative
My experience of public transport in Dublin is broadly positive. For sure there are delays etc, but not always down to the fault of Dublin Bus. Roadworks for one, or increased passenger use. Unlike airlines, bus companies cannot always know when an extra 100 passengers will arrive for the service. Even so, carrying over 300,000 passengers a day (with no pre-bookings) is a big operation, it is roughly the same with Ryanair (with pre-bookings, no road works, other transport users using the same lane etc)This sentence very much sums up the daily experience of Dublin's public transport system.
I am sure users of public transport across the country would find it hard to disagree with me.
The point is, with Ryanair you have a choice - use a different airline
Is that really a practical alternative? If I bring my car, yes, but if I want to go for one night on a business trip then its not really is it?Take the ferry.
So my choices are Ryanair, or move abroad?If you are living on the continent, take a train
With public transport system, there is no comparable choice
Why does it matter to you?
Do you really? I mean, if I want to get from Dublin to Heathrow, the only real option I can see is Aer Lingus. There is no other choice. On the other hand, if you don't want to use a bus, you can use the train, DART, LUAS or taxi
They have 13,000 staff so it's quite reasonable to say, without actually having checked the precise statistics, that "they sack people all the time".You made the claim that they 'sack people all the time', I'm suggesting they don't. That it is not quite that easy just to sack someone. I would expect a large organization like Ryanair to know that, and I would be very surprised if they do sack anyone on foot of this issue.
So all I'm asking is, do you know for sure that they sack people all the time, or are you just making that up?
They have 13,000 staff so it's quite reasonable to say, without actually having checked the precise statistics, that "they sack people all the time".
No it's not. I've worked in companies of that size and no company sacks people all the time. People move on or retire all of the time but sacking would be only a tiny number a year.
So I suppose, being pedantic, your point is true. But of no use to anybody.
They have 13,000 staff so it's quite reasonable to say, without actually having checked the precise statistics, that "they sack people all the time".
I asked you why does this matter to you. You haven't answered. As far as I can see you're merely trolling.
Part of that attitude stems from, what I perceive to be an over-exaggerated threat of being sacked in the private sector compared to that of the public sector.
It was a throwaway comment. And it's still probably factually true, given the industrial relations culture in Ryanair. I can't fathom why its so controversial that it has upset The BS
the point I am trying to make, which is my bad for not making it clear, is that there is a tendency to admonish the public sector and all its apparent failings while pointing to the lack of accountability. This is followed with the somewhat exaggerated claims that if such failings occurred in the private sector then the axe would fall on those responsible, no questions asked. This is proffered as an effective way to foster maximum productivity and efficiency, hence its good value for consumers.
The reality is far from this. When it comes to accountability in the private sector, most managers will automatically will adopt a strategy of self-preservation pointing to system failures rather than personal accountability similar to public sector workers.
This is not a criticism, this is just an acknowledgement of the reality of working in large organizations. That when the worst hits the fan, both public and private sector worker's will react in similar vein.
But the worker's in the public service are then lambasted for the 'protective culture' etc, when in reality, private sector worker's, working in large organizations, adopt the same methods of self-preservation.
You think?At tad exaggerated there I think!
Compensation that airlines are forced to pay out come by way of European directives if I'm not mistaken, not out of the goodness of airline generosity. I would be all for all public transport companies being compelled to do the same.
So you have an alternative? More expensive, for sure, but ditto if your flight gets cancelled and you have to get somewhere (like home for instance).
My experience of public transport in Dublin is broadly positive. For sure there are delays etc, but not always down to the fault of Dublin Bus. Roadworks for one, or increased passenger use. Unlike airlines, bus companies cannot always know when an extra 100 passengers will arrive for the service. Even so, carrying over 300,000 passengers a day (with no pre-bookings) is a big operation, it is roughly the same with Ryanair (with pre-bookings, no road works, other transport users using the same lane etc)
No, I don't. I use the train service occasionally now, about ten times a year. Always on time, leaving and arriving.
Do you really? I mean, if I want to get from Dublin to Heathrow, the only real option I can see is Aer Lingus. There is no other choice. On the other hand, if you don't want to use a bus, you can use the train, DART, LUAS or taxi
Is that really a practical alternative? If I bring my car, yes, but if I want to go for one night on a business trip then its not really is it?
So my choices are Ryanair, or move abroad?
Bus, train, DART, LUAS, taxi - all in the same continent too!
Have you any facts though to back up that tautological claim of over-exaggeration?
You apparently have never been to a city with a well executed public transport system
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?