Re: Coursing
Hi Brouhaha - Yes, I realise I'm starting to stretch my analogies here, but I'm trying to explore the principles involved. Thanks for your help in narrowing this down.
If I interpret you correctly, you tell us that coursing is accepting because
a) Only a small percentage of hares get injured
b) The injury to the hares is not intentional
I'm finding it hard to accept the 'not intentional' arguement. By putting a hare and trained greyhounds in the same field, you are setting up the scenario where the hare has a chance of getting caught by the greyhound. The whole artificial scenario is designed around putting the greyhound & the hare together.
Also, I think you are ignoring the sheer terror that must be caused to the hare. No-one tells the hare beforehand that the greyhound is muzzled, or that the he only has a 1 in 100 chance of being caught. I see no good reason to inflict this terror on an animal in the name of 'sport'.