I don't know where you're getting the offence from tbh odyssey, I certainly wasn't demonising anyone. I was simply pointing out that, imho, there is far too much access to alcohol these days, it is readily available in a number of places. This isn't aimed at those who drink responsibly but those who do not. I don't think it would be a hardship to have to go to an off licence to purchase wine tbh.
Whilst I'm not at all equating the two things as being the same, in terms of how we view the cause of the issue there is quite a difference between how we view the cheap and plentiful availability of alcohol here and how we view the cheap and plentiful availability of guns in the US.
I'll assume it wasn't intended so, but certainly some of your comments could have been interpreted that way e.g. especially about drinking at home - and eh I am one to get the rebuttal in first before waiting for the translation... But let's move on...
If it's not a hardship to have to go to an off licence to purchase wine, how will it prevent alcoholics from getting access to alcohol? It won't.
It is an inconvenience and those most inconvenienced are the responsible ones e.g. no one is being protected by denying me the ability to buy a bottle of wine at 11am on Sunday in a supermarket if that happens to be the handiest time for me to do the big shop.
Why should my choice of wine purchases be limited to those available in an off licence, at off licence prices? If LIDL have a good variety of wines at reasonable prices, why shouldn't I have that choice? Is an alcoholic really going to care about whether LIDL's Chianti is nicer than the one in the local off licence? No, but I do.
If you're an alcoholic and you can't pass a bottle of wine in a supermarket... then what next? You shouldn't have to pass by a pub or off licence in case you are tempted???
Where does it end? You can only buy meat from a butcher's shop because it is high in saturated fat and poor people shouldn't be buying meat as their money would go further on potatoes?
For a restriction on liberty to be justified, it must be proportionate and serve the purpose of protecting society. I see these measures as trying to protect individuals from themselves and we can't afford a government big enough to do that 100%, nor would one be desirable.
I'll come back again to France. They have drinkable bottles of wine in supermarkets for 2 euros and I can buy it at 9am on a Saturday or Sunday.
How is their war on poverty going? Better than ours?
Is Ireland's war on poverty aided by having the cheapest bottle of drinkable wine here being 10 euros and only available in an off licence with restricted opening hours? I haven't read a solid answer as to why Ireland's war on poverty justifies those restrictions.
I see lots of back slapping in government circles when we see dramatic drops in tobacco purposes in Ireland, some of it is real, but ask them about illegal traders in cigarettes and wait for the coughs and silences... if we push alcohol too far in that same direction, all it will mean is trips to Newry for some, and trips to back alleys for others...
There comes a point where the price difference after tax becomes so great that smuggling etc becomes profitable. Tobacco has reached that point... is alcohol next?