heinbloed said:
CCOVICH's " argument " about futuristic oil resources is useless concerning the current market prices . To much enterprise ? The world looks a bit square when you get reality from sky TV . Or when your look at it is limited by the width of the windscreen .
No one would invest money in new oil resources when not expecting higher profits .
This isn't my "argument", I was merely stating an alternative view put forward in an article I recently read. Oil prices may indeed continue to rise from now until eternity for all I know.
Profit=Selling price x volume - costs
There are three parts to the profit equation, not just 'price' as you seem to think.
Also, companies
tend not to fund major capital projects from price increases (unless you are an Irish semi-state), but from bond or share issues. Of course, if oil companies are sitting on a mountain of cash, they could use that, but I haven't looked at their balance sheets lately.
I don't need a patronising lecture from
you on how the tax system works. Why not say that we need higher income taxes, higher capital taxes, higher VAT on all goods to improve the literacy rate in this country (P.S. for somone so concerned with illiteracy, you're spelling and grammer are awful-OK?), not just on petrol. Why not compare the OECD statistics on illeteracy with the price of bananas? The price of a pint? The price of a pack of fags?
P.P.S. I don't have Sky, I don't watch any reality TV (other than sports or the 'news') and you are not teaching any 'lessons' on this board professor-OK?