And yet I take it you are still with them. You demand and expect every ECB and market reduction going, but the idea that a loss-making company might have to increase its prices is unacceptable to you? This is a free market - if you are not happy with the product you signed up for then head on to another company.
They only recently passed on the last ecb rate reduction - as usual dragging it out as slow as possible. I bet come monday though I will have the letter in the post saying it will go back up!
And yet I take it you are still with them. You demand and expect every ECB and market reduction going, but the idea that a loss-making company might have to increase its prices is unacceptable to you? This is a free market - if you are not happy with the product you signed up for then head on to another company.
-2 (one for you and one for the nut that agrees with you)
Get real. You are joking right? I bet you havent walked into a bank hat in hand in the last 6 months. Kicked out on your keister you would be... Try to remortgage have you? Tried to get a new loan for anything? I have and not just for myself - they arent giving out money even in small amounts without at least a kidney.
So your proposal to sort this is to have the banks continue to write loans at a loss? That is hardly going to help the situation. If we are looking to have a functioning banking system, then the banks need to start operating on a commercial basis.
None of these banks has fired even one employee - have they tried to cut costs anywhere at all?
Have you tried moving a mortgage in the last 6 months? Impossible. The banks are closed for new business/lending.
Read my past posts instead of making up my proposals for me. None of these banks has fired even one employee - have they tried to cut costs anywhere at all?
-2 (one for you and one for the nut that agrees with you)
As for costs, all banks have cut costs. But they are not going about it the route you suggest. Of course they could cut a lot of costs by simply sacking a whole load of people. But can you imagine the response to that?
10,997 new mortgages to the value of some €2 billion were issued during the first quarter of 2009 !
How do you know they have cut costs? If they (all the banks) are doing less business now than a year ago, and less again than then year before that - then surely there are people standing around getting paid to do nothing. Where I work - those people have been sacked. Every time people get sacked, there is reaction - but its reality.
Who?They have or are in the process of getting rid of 500 people. They have also outlined a further €22 million of payroll costs to be cut on top of this.
10,997 new mortgages to the value of some €2 billion were issued during the first quarter of 2009 !
http://www.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/property-mortgages/enraged-mortgage-holders-want-loan-transfers-1844676.html
"One financial analyst said banks were reluctant to take on new business, adding "you'd probably have to be a couple both working in the public service and with less than 50pc loan to value ratio on your home to qualify" for a switch-over. "
The are there if you bother to check.
Yes I see them thanks - those stats emphasize my point that they are doing less work with the same amount of staff.
http://www.irishexaminer.com/busine...-350m-eib-funds-set-aside-for-smes-97588.html
Ok, I give up. You are right - its business as usual and the banks have ALL trimmed the fat as close to the bone as the rest of the economy.
So what we're trying to say is that banks need to have risky loans going out to make it seem like they're lending? Lending for the sake of lending is not a good policy imo.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?