Pepper customer in High Court claiming rate should be same as ptsb

Brendan Burgess

Founder
Messages
54,067
This is good news except that it has gone to mediation and perhaps Pepper will settle with a non-disclosure agreement rather than risk an adverse judgement which the Central Bank would require them to apply to all loans.


One of the arguments Pepper used to justify the high rates was the price they paid ptsb for the loans!
But they said that they could not disclose the price they paid.
The Judge wasn't having any of it.

Mr Justice David Nolan, who previously made discovery orders in the case, said the defendant should swear an affidavit of discovery saying they are not in a position to say the price for this loan. The defendant should also state the price for the portfolio of loans.
 
The recent case in the UK re the Whistletree Loans was lost by the "Vulture Prisoners"
See link

If its a standard variable loan then the PTSB T&Cs allow
1 For the sale of the mortgage
2 The new owner to set the interest rate

 
The recent case in the UK re the Whistletree Loans was lost by the "Vulture Prisoners"
See link

If its a standard variable loan then the PTSB T&Cs allow
1 For the sale of the mortgage
2 The new owner to set the interest rate

Does that have much bearing on/relevance to the Pepper/PTSB case given that it involves a completely different company in a different jurisdiction? (And a class action suit which I believe are still not possible in Ireland?).
 
Does that have much bearing on/relevance to the Pepper/PTSB case given that it involves a completely different company in a different jurisdiction? (And a class action suit which I believe are still not possible in Ireland?).
We have the same common law system as the UK and UK law is commonly quoted for precedence in courts in this country .
 
In my opinion these people are being treated far worse than those who lost their trackers.
Agreed but getting an Irish Court to rule in accordance with the EU Fair Terms Directive is nigh on impossible , PTSB have a nasty little clause in their mortgage contracts which cover the vulture's to a certain point. Getting that ruled upon is the hard bit.
 
But the UK case is a class action and I don't believe that such cases can be taken in Ireland?
The Class Action bit is irrelevant , that just allowed a large number of people join the case , the ruling was on the legal points taken by the Vulture Prisoners to say they should have been on a better rate , they lost .
Here if one person won the case it would set a precedent and all others would be settled out of court like the Army Deafness cases of 30 years ago or the Tracker Cases of 10 years ago .
Alot of people are watching this case against Pepper to see what way it goes , unless there is a very public fight where Pepper win then I expect more cases to follow .
If there is negotiation's with Non Disclosure attached then you can be sure Pepper have folded , it will be worth keeping an eye on .
 
I studied the Whistletree judgement at the time and I believe that it boosts the claims of customers of Irish vulture funds rather than damns them.

I attach my notes but would point out that I am not a lawyer.
 

Attachments

  • BBs assessment of the implications of the Northern Rock to TSB court case.docx
    36.9 KB · Views: 15
We have the same common law system as the UK and UK law is commonly quoted for precedence in courts in this country .
The issue here is more likely to revolve around statute law rather than common law.

I once found myself in the position where a barrister applied to have me committed to prison for contempt of court. The judge asked on what basis, when the barrister quoted a UK decision, the judge harrumphed at him, 'Is this a UK court, do I look like a UK judge?' I could have kissed him !
 
Back
Top