Duke of Marmalade
Registered User
- Messages
- 4,596
That is the best explanation I have seen yet for the received wisdom of not being 100% in equities in retirement even though life expectancy might be 25 years.There is no definitive, universally applicable answer to this question. It very much depends on your individual circumstances.
Personally, I intend to have 10 years of anticipated spending in “safe” assets (cash and government bonds) at the start of my retirement and I will gradually build up that amount over the 10 years prior to retirement.
Anything over and above that amount will continue to be invested in a global equity index fund.
It’s probably worth saying that my objective is to minimise the risk of running out of money before I run out of life. My objective is not to maximise my terminal wealth.
It is certainly true that there is a very high probability (but definitely no guarantee) that equities will outperform bonds over a 25+ year period.
But that’s not the full story when you’re spending down a portfolio.
The sequence of returns is also hugely relevant and hence my proposed 10 year buffer.
I particularly like the idea of 10 years spending being in cash/bonds for even if equities outperform, by definition you will be spending and so no huge opportunity lost whilst on the other hand a 30% hit to your 10 year spending fund would be a serious matter.