1. I recently submitted my own passport renewal online and got the passport back two days later. Top marks.
2. I submitted my child’s passport application in early January.
3. I heard nothing for two months and the tracker told me it was being processed.
4. Throughout March and April I spend hours on the phone trying to get through unsuccessfully as the line was so busy. Ditto with their webchat facility. No joy.
5. In April I eventually got through on the phone and was placed in a queue and after an hour I spoke to a human. She identified an issue with the Garda witness signature. This was never notified to me by email as soon as it was identified which would usually be the case.
6. I got an email from them to download and print the Consent form and got it resigned and witnessed and submitted that day.
7. Last week, I got an email saying the issue now was the child’s photo, which had been provisionally approved by the dfa website online process. The online dfa passport submission application cropped the very top of her head off, leaving no space between the top of her head and the photo border, and then approved the photo for submission.
8. Clicked the link to re-upload the photo and the same issue arose. There was no facility to click “back” to resubmit a different photo so I had to apply for a new resubmission link to be emailed to me. That was last Monday week and I still await the link by email.
It seems to me that instead of reviewing an application in its entirety to identify ALL possible issues, they instead stop processing it once they hit the first issue.
This is inefficient and only adds more work on the Passport Office in the long run. As soon as they came across the first issue with my passport they never notified me of it. I had to chase them to establish the delay, hindered by their general unavailability over the phone and on webchat. When the issue was identified and remedied, they identified a new issue with the photo - a photo they had preapproved was now unsatisfactory.
People make mistakes (up to half the people making applications by the looks of things), but this is no excuse for shoddy and inefficient systems. They perhaps should examine the categories of errors and focus on educating applicants to avoid such errors as well as having systems in place to facilitate the immediate rectification of such errors.