Grand - when my kids are old enough to read and comprehend a document of that complexity I will advise them of their responsibilities. Until then I will continue to keep them on the path.
Maybe some of the legal eagles out there can clarify - I understood the rules of the road was an explanation and interpretation of the relevant legislation and best principles, but unless something significant has changed the contents of the document are not enshrined in law. Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying it has no value, but I am saying that it is the legislation that is the driving force and the rules of the road is only a representation for the lay user of the legislation. To give an example of the interpretation issue - you shouldn't cycle more than one abreast in 'heavy traffic' - how and where is 'heavy traffic' defined ? Can you get busted for cycling two abreast - no. Can you get busted for driving without due consideration for this - possibly, depending on the definition of 'driving' since you don't drive a bike.
z
Maybe some of the legal eagles out there can clarify - I understood the rules of the road was an explanation and interpretation of the relevant legislation and best principles, but unless something significant has changed the contents of the document are not enshrined in law. Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying it has no value, but I am saying that it is the legislation that is the driving force and the rules of the road is only a representation for the lay user of the legislation. To give an example of the interpretation issue - you shouldn't cycle more than one abreast in 'heavy traffic' - how and where is 'heavy traffic' defined ? Can you get busted for cycling two abreast - no. Can you get busted for driving without due consideration for this - possibly, depending on the definition of 'driving' since you don't drive a bike.
z