... I do however object to subsidising fraudsters from Northern Ireland who claim benefits in both jurisdictions and fraudsters who've long departed the State but continue to leech benefits. The waste and leakage in this country is ludicrous.
EVERYTHING has to be paid for.
It doesn't all have to be paid for by the high-earners though.
By the way, I include pensions on this. I know retired people on €50k pensions who still get the State pension on top of this. We need to start helping the people who need help. Not every Mr and Mrs Smith and their little Johnny.
That's terrible though - some people have paid PRSI all their working life and who will (in all probability) have included the State Pension when determining how much to put away into their own pension fund.
You now advocate pulling the rug out from under them.
The State Pension is already taxable anyway
I wonder if we'll have the 'courage' to cut tax breaks on pension savings (http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/1004/budget.html) or tax breaks on private healthcare or tax breaks on private college, or tax breaks in investments in building private healthcare clinics, or tax breaks on property investments?So the UK can remove child benefit from any family earning over £44,000. Wonder would we have the same courage to at least reduce ours?
I wonder if we'll have the 'courage' to cut tax breaks on pension savings (http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/1004/budget.html) or tax breaks on private healthcare or tax breaks on private college, or tax breaks in investments in building private healthcare clinics, or tax breaks on property investments?
Do you think that some of these issues should be addressed before we start looking at child benefit?
There are more than 400,000 people unemployed in the State but I'm sure a large proportion of those jetted off to the sun this summer. I'm sure plenty of them hoover pints and cigarettes all week without any thought in relation to how the State finances itself.
No offence but that makes no sense. For a start there are not 400,000 on the dole because they want to be or because there is no incentive to get a job. Secondly, so you really believe that someone should get child benefit because they pay lots of tax? Thirdly, there is no easy solution!Because the person on €1,000,000 a year is paying a fortune in tax. In my view, they should get some benefit for that. It isn't fair that someone who contributes nothing to society gets everything for free while the person contributing a lot to society gets nothing.
The simple solution is to tax all social welfare benefits. That way, the wealthy have their child benefit cut by approximately 50% and the stay on the dole/go out to work anomaly is addressed (i.e. the disincentive to go to work).
No offence but that makes no sense. For a start there are not 400,000 on the dole because they want to be or because there is no incentive to get a job. Secondly, so you really believe that someone should get child benefit because they pay lots of tax? Thirdly, there is no easy solution!
Of course not.
However, even during the good times there were more than 100,000 people on the dole. These are clearly people who won't work so they should be forced to do so.
I believe that those who contribute are already contributing enough. The way out of this mess is to bring more lower paid people into the tax net, to eliminate waste and to (yes I know) go after public sector pay again.
BazFitz, no offence taken however, even during the good times we had vulnerable people in our society such as the disabled, the blind, mentally ill, sick, chronically depressed, elderly etc. They do make up a significant amount of the unemployed. Since the earliest of times it has always been accepted that a proportion of the population were unable to support themselves and have to be provided for by their communities and in more modern times by the State.
The public service is full of people that could never show up to work ever again without any decline in the quality of the service.
Source please?Social welfare fraud is rampant.
Source please?The public service is full of people that could never show up to work ever again without any decline in the quality of the service.
Source please?So now there are thousands of useless people in the public service who literally have nothing to do.
Yeah, we've all heard this urban myths about the clocks, and de blacks who leave their buggies behind, and the HSE who buy taxies for them. They're all myths. Let's get past the 'I know someone' school of policy development.I know someone in the public service who was savaged by their boss for changing the clock in the office to reflect "summer time" (i.e. the hour). They were advised that there were people in the OPW whose job that was. Eh, hello!
THis is very simplistic. No private sector merger or takeover would operate on such a simplistic basis.The greatest abomination is the HSE. Student[....] Meanwhile, tens of people continue to do administrative work within the HSE. The point of merging the various health boards was to get synergy. Instead of having (say) ten finance directors, 10 public relations officers and 10 logistics directors, you'd have one of each and save millions (these people usually earn more than €80,000 per annum and have defined pensions so their capitalized cost to the State probably runs to somewhere between €1,000,000 and €2,000,000 each).
Source please?
Source please?
Source please?
Yeah, we've all heard this urban myths about the clocks, and de blacks who leave their buggies behind, and the HSE who buy taxies for them. They're all myths. Let's get past the 'I know someone' school of policy development.
THis is very simplistic. No private sector merger or takeover would operate on such a simplistic basis.
Fair enough so. I guess it must be true because we heard it from a bloke in the pub. Let's build our economic policy around that principle.The above is the ostrich mentality. You expect me to provide you with links which support the following assertions:
- The administrative side of the public sector is overstaffed,
- Social welfare fraud is rampant,
- Bertie Ahern's intervention prevented synergy when the various health boards merged, and
- There are people in the public service with nothing to do.
Why should I? Why don't you attempt to disprove my contentions? Of course no such evidence exists to support either side of the argument. What do you expect me to post - a link to the secret Department of Finance memo in relation to overstaffing in the public service?
No private sector merger would result in zero synergy and no redundancies. Do you think that if (say) Tesco Ireland and Dunnes Stores merged there'd be no redundancies in the back office? Pull the other one.
And do you think that the garage owners who receive €18,000 HSE cheques for taxis from immigrants are lying? It's easy to dismiss the opinions and views of real people with real experiences when trying to have a lofty social argument. Do you think we're too laid back in this country in relation to social welfare and have been taken advantage of by opportunists from sub Saharan Africa?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?