I do appreciate your nervousness about a la carte interpretations of the law, but I think there are certain times where it is understandable.
I would be more inclined to lobby/campaign for an allegedly unreasonable law to be changed than to arbitrarily break or bend it for the purposes of expediency. Otherwise where do we draw the line in terms of people deciding that certain laws are "bad" and should not apply to them? Seems to me that's the sort of attitude that ends up requiring expensive tribunals to sort out... :\
I would be more inclined to lobby/campaign for an allegedly unreasonable law to be changed than to arbitrarily break or bend it for the purposes of expediency. Otherwise where do we draw the line in terms of people deciding that certain laws are "bad" and should not apply to them? Seems to me that's the sort of attitude that ends up requiring expensive tribunals to sort out... :\