Because you are opportunistic.
I'd suggest Germany. You'd love it there as a landlord.
I would appreciate it if you refrain from personal slights. You don't know me and it's not for you to decide if I am opportunistic or not. I wrote about what I'd do, not my opinion of you for wanting someone else (your landlord) to provide security of tenure for you, without you having to take the risks that go with the property ownership
I do actually happen to want stable longish-term tenants paying market rent to me for my property. But I don't want to lose control of my property. The law already affords the tenants some security of tenure requiring the landlords to give nearly 4 months notice. Which is a big improvement on the old days when tenants could be kicked out with only 1 month notice.
My point is that it's
my property and I want the right to use it as
I want - provided the tenants are treated fairly while they are there and are given adequate notice to leave if I have other plans for the property.
Besides why exactly is the right to stay indefinitely/longer than the owner wants them to in a property that belongs to someone else is so important for tenants if they still have to pay
market rent? After all, if the landlord asks them to leave and they are paying
market rent, it should be possible to rent a similar property for similar rent?
The laws affording tenants security of tenure usually also limit future rent increases, forcing landlords to subsidize their tenants, indefinitely.
I doubt that many professional (and not opportunistic

) landlord would be happy with that
