This whole area is heartless. Friend (disabled) was entitled to free license but was unaware of how to get it until he got outside help. Was approved for the license but while waiting got a summons for no license. Court did not consider his written submission and duly fined him, plus he had to buy a license while he waited for the wheels of government to get around to issuing him with the license he was entitled to. Ended up with two licenses and would not refund the second one!You should have let him take you to court. They would have soon backed down.
I have TV but it's not connected to anything but PlayStation. Do I have to pay the license anyway?
with saorview its digital so no need for an aerial. is it if you have a tv you need a licence???
so if i dont have soarview unit do i have to pay the licence next year? aerials will be obsolete from 21st october so where do i stand
I was threatened with legal action a few years ago for having an aerial on the roof (there was no TV) and I was forced, through gritted teeth, to buy a license for the aerial after a long conversation with a very stroppy employee in An Post. I got absolutely nowhere with him, even after inviting him to send someone to the house anytime to check for televisions. He was absolutely adamant that under the 1926 Act (at the time) an aerial was required.
“ television set ” means any electronic apparatus capable of receiving and exhibiting television broadcasting services broadcast for general reception (whether or not its use for that purpose is dependent on the use of anything else in conjunction with it) and any software or assembly comprising such apparatus and other apparatus;
If that was true it means everyone not using a PC or Laptop for TV (and with no other devices) is also included aswell.
That was the point!
Really? you didn't mention that group, you mention the group using computers to view TV without an aerial which is entirely different.
They sent me out a declaration declaring that I do not possess a TV, which I had to sign. Hopefully this will be the end of the letter writing and I will hear no more.
Ah, where did I say whether an aerial was involved or not?
...the expression “apparatus for wireless telegraphy” means apparatus for sending and receiving or for sending only or for receiving only messages, spoken words, music, images, pictures, prints, or other communications, sounds, signs, or signals by wireless telegraphy and includes any part of such apparatus and any article primarily designed for use as part of such apparatus and not capable of being conveniently used for any other purpose;...