The adversarial position is how the whole system works. It's like asking a dog not to bark. I don't suppose they thought they were retained to tickle MM. The presiding judge, or whoever was adjudicating, could always say that wasn't cricket. IMO it's a legitimate question - its about his motivation in the wake of the smear campaign - it's not inferring he was a kiddie fiddler. It's like asking Gerry Conlon (before his death..) if being wrongly imprisoned for 15 years turned him against the British state - you're not inferring he planted a bomb in a pub in Guildford...
Why Francie couldn't come out with a version of that I dont know - due to the beatification process I guess. I've no time for incompetence, misleading or what not thereafter, so there's the crime in my view.
Mick Wallace is just you're average pub stool cynic, the vox pop "they're all a shower, never done nuttin for me" type. I'm all for calling out incompetence, but this country just loves hurling from the ditch, I wouldn't fancy doing the job so I don't presume its easy.
Why Francie couldn't come out with a version of that I dont know - due to the beatification process I guess. I've no time for incompetence, misleading or what not thereafter, so there's the crime in my view.
Mick Wallace is just you're average pub stool cynic, the vox pop "they're all a shower, never done nuttin for me" type. I'm all for calling out incompetence, but this country just loves hurling from the ditch, I wouldn't fancy doing the job so I don't presume its easy.