Also stock up on booze and tobacco. They'll be worth a fortune when the economy collapses.
Nobody will have the means to buy them from you.
Also stock up on booze and tobacco. They'll be worth a fortune when the economy collapses.
lets just have a big party that lasts a few months and blow it all, at least we would have enjoyed it
Nobody will have the means to buy them from you.
But I could trade them for things I need.
Why wait? Why hold off addresses these issues and other abuses while singling out public sector staff? There is no fairness in that.And all those things may yet happen Complainer.
A fair bit of your tax increase will go towards govt spending with the private sector too.I also expect increased taxation, I won't complain, even though most of the extra tax I pay will (quite possibly) go towards footing the wage bill of those particular group of workers who have been unfairly targeted.
No, if they dare to hit the PS with two cuts when everyone else gets hit with one, we'll show them the error of their ways.if they dare to hit the ps with tax increases, you'll just bring the country down anyway?
No, if they dare to hit the PS with two cuts when everyone else gets hit with one, we'll show them the error of their ways.
Fairness is a concept that has to apply to others as well as yourself.Why wait? Why hold off addresses these issues and other abuses while singling out public sector staff? There is no fairness in that.
Did you notice that no one has answered you?And when the govt cannot pay your wages because they cant borrow any more money, who will be in error ?
Did you notice that no one has answered you?
Perhaps they're in denial...
Or perhaps they are too busy working serving the public to be reading/posting on AAM?Perhaps they're in denial...
And when the govt cannot pay your wages because they cant borrow any more money, who will be in error ?
Isn't it strange how the firstly/secondly/thirdly downsides of the pension levy don't get much airtime? Isn't it strange how the example you give isn't of the landlord with multiple properties who experienced approx ten-fold growth in the value of his investment over the previous 15 years and maximises his interest allowance artificially with interest-only loans, even though he has more than enough cash to pay down the capital? We're a longway from fairness in this discussion.Fairness is a concept that has to apply to others as well as yourself.
Your main suggestion was to eliminate the mortgage interest offset against rent.
This is highly unfair as any other business can offset their interest against revenues to calculate the profit on which they are taxed.
Secondly eliminating the interest offset by definition targets those with little or no equity in their investment properties i.e. it's not an effective way of targetting wealth
Thirdly most of these people will have paid hefty stamp duties in recent years.
So I ask you to have a long thing about it and come back and tell me whether you think someone with a loss making investment who has ploughed a huge amount of stamp duty into the exchequer should now be targetted.
By the way I do not own an investment property.
And when the govt cannot pay your wages because they cant borrow any more money, who will be in error ?
Please specify exactly what you mean by "going after bankers developers etc" and roughly how much you intend to raise by your actions.The Government, for not going after bankers, developers etc and for trying to get the little people to bear the cost.
Please specify exactly what you mean by "going after bankers developers etc" and roughly how much you intend to raise by your actions.