dereko1969
Registered User
- Messages
- 3,046
269 full properties available from June 4 - June 11. So nearly 9 times the number of rental properties on Daft. That was for 4 adults. 306 when you input for 2 adults.
Some difference in fairness between that and 1,959. Strip out the glamping pods, yurts, granny flats, student residences etc from the 269 and the gap will close further,269 full properties available from June 4 - June 11. So nearly 9 times the number of rental properties on Daft. That was for 4 adults. 306 when you input for 2 adults.
Yes but if you add even 269 new units to the Kerry rental market, would it make a blind bit of difference to market rents? And bear in mind that Kerry is a heavily touristed county.I'm not sure what criteria the person used on twitter it was just a flat comparison. From the first couple of pages on Airbnb there didn't seem to be m/any yurts/granny flats. I think it's safe to say there are multiples on Airbnb than are available on Daft.
I'm not trying to single out this section of the housing market but it's an issue as is the number of county councils that have unoccupied properties........and multiple other factorsI know where you're coming from but think it's still worth noting:
There's no way that anything near 50% are easily reinhabitable. It appears a bigger problem than it is because the planning system incentivises their retention even in a derelict state. It's much easier to get planning for a new build if there is an existing building on the site.
Agreed.
You kinda did though.
Agreed. A very generous Section 23-type tax relief such as applied in the Rural Renewal Scheme area during the Celtic Tiger era would do the trick, but there seems to be little appetite for this.
Sooner or later we are going to have to build our way out of this.
I think in the budget they will allow property tax to be tax deductible and possibly reduce taxation to 20% plus prsi and USC. Also reintroduce the tax credit for renters.There was a discussion on the radio today on RTE Joe Duffy and a landlord at the end of the program summed it all up. He had 10 properties and sold the lot.
He said if he charged €1000 per month after taxes, usc of 6%, property tax he ended up with €200or less. If one tenant did not pay then that was it. Just not worth it.
Might be too late. There is always a sting in the tail.I think in the budget they will allow property tax to be tax deductible and possibly reduce taxation to 20% plus prsi and USC. Also reintroduce the tax credit for renters.
They need to stop haemorrhaging small landlords and keep rental sector alive. And who knows, they might actually attract small landlords into the sector too.
The problem can't be fixed by hammering these landlords who by and large are charging well below market rent in a lot of instances.
Pity the Government will not allow the resetting of rents once a long term tenant has moved on.I think in the budget they will allow property tax to be tax deductible and possibly reduce taxation to 20% plus prsi and USC. Also reintroduce the tax credit for renters.
They need to stop haemorrhaging small landlords and keep rental sector alive. And who knows, they might actually attract small landlords into the sector too.
The problem can't be fixed by hammering these landlords who by and large are charging well below market rent in a lot of instances.
That would be political suicide and would allow the howls of all sorts of nonsense from charities, SF, the left ........always remember landlords are evil people and are the same as the landlords that forced our ancestors out of hovels to die in a field or worse emigrate.Pity the Government will not allow the resetting of rents once a long term tenant has moved on.
At the moment you have to have a house sitting idle for 2 years in order for this to happen. It would take a number of years to get back the two years lost rent even if it was well below the market rent.
You've left out one thing: a friendly lending market. One of the reasons there were so many people with 2nd properties in the first place was that we had a lending market that incentivised it. Now very few non institutional landlords get BTL mortgages. Its not really possible for anybody to enter the market without inheriting a rented property now.You need lower tax rates on landlords (small landlords with one or two properties).
You need higher tax rates on institutional landlords and reits.
You need an ability for landlords to get bad tenants out of their property quickly. It's a joke taking two years with no payment etc.
If the government act quickly they can stem the tide and maybe attract new landlords into the sector.
Perhaps relating tax paid to the actual rent value (like VAT) rather than income tax? It might be controversial but it would reward landlords who haven't hiked rent and are now locked into rents far beneath market rates.make LPT tax deductible yes. You could have rental income not liable for USC and PRSI (reducing effective tax rate on many 'mom and pop' landlords by 11%. If they want equality of treatment for all landlords then charging one group 51% tax rate and the other larger institutional landlords 12.5% (if even that!) then it's not really fair. Also, I would suggest that new tenancies, which are the ones increasing by 10% a year according to reports, are dominated by larger institutional type landlords, whereas 'mom and pop' landlords are often charging way under market rent as a result of being nice to previous/current tenants and not raising rents due to tenants being general good tenants anyway.
To help current small landlords,the government needs to do in on the taxation side or else helping to speed up the removal of bad tenants and instead of giving landlords nothing but "responsibilities" give them some "rights" would also help.
I guarantee that many of those people are landlords themselves and quietly have no issue doing exactly as they please. It usually takes me 5 minutes to shift a conversation about how terribly unfair these high rents are to how unfair it is that the persons parent has to deal with this horrible tenant etc. 1 in 5 people own second properties: that's a lot of people with a stake in the game.That would be political suicide and would allow the howls of all sorts of nonsense from charities, SF, the left ........always remember landlords are evil people and are the same as the landlords that forced our ancestors out of hovels to die in a field or worse emigrate.
We can't really sneer at the 1990s though, a decade when we more or less got things right in relation to rental and other housing availability.Good article by Fiona Reddan in the Irish Times today on incentives to keep private small landlords in the rental market. I think it captures the main points.
Tax incentives for landlords? How very 1990s
Seven options to ease the tax burden chasing smaller landlords out of the market
Exodus of small-time landlords risks escalating housing crisis. Here is what the State can dowww.irishtimes.com
It's a nice article that sets out all the options. I think policymakers need to decide whether they want to keep fiddling or do something radical.Good article by Fiona Reddan in the Irish Times today on incentives to keep private small landlords in the rental market. I think it captures the main points.
That would mean an effective tax increase on many recipients of rental income and would actively discourage investment in properties requiring ongoing high maintenance or costly upkeep. Belongs firmly in the Fiddling or Actually Counter Productive lists.Radical
Tax all rental income at a flat rate of something like 25%. completely separately from other income. No deductions for anything except perhaps major renovations with the relief spread over several years.