I can appreciate how it might come across as vague Sarenco but my sense of unfairness is anything but. I feel we actually agree on quite a bit certainly that candidates will share my sense of outrage but offer little as far as suggestions to solve this. Our problem is that FG will probably get back in as I don't think the opposition will get the seat numbers and I know you're not trying to have a go. I do think the consumer protection authorities should be made do their job. We do disagree on certain solutions but something needs to be done as I have mentioned my concerns about higher rates when they come egarrears and repossessions. There's enough advisors on big money that should be able to come up with a workable solution , it's just there seems to be no effort to do somethingThat's my point really Tony.
"Something should be done" sounds a bit like "down with this sort of thing" to me - it's just incredibly vague.
I have no doubt whatsoever that a multitude of parties and candidates will share your sense of outrage (or at least will be anxious to give that impression) but I would be far less confident that any will offer any meaningful proposals in this regard - they certainly haven't so far.
Yes, FF and SF have published private members bills to give the Central Bank the power to fix or adjust rates but what difference would that make? The Central Bank has made it quite clear that it doesn't want this power and wouldn't exercise any such power even if it did have it.
I'm not trying to have a go - I happen to agree with you that there is a cohort of variable rate borrowers that are deserving of legal protection and I have made certain suggestions in this regard.
This is it and I sincerely hope that enough people will do so so as they realise that it still is an issue. I've heard nobody other than Michael McGrath mention it, somebody on another thread mentioned that they heard he did say it in the Dail. Obviously a low priority for them.Fair enough Tony - I'm not for a second doubting your strength of feeling on this issue.
Tell you what, if a politician (any politician) canvasses you for a vote in the upcoming election, I would suggest that you don't let them off the doorstep until they tell you exactly what their party proposes to do on this issue if they participate in government. I'm regularly amazed how party positions change if they think it's costing them votes but you really need to nail them down on their specific proposals and then make your judgment.
He certainly raises this issue on a very regular basis but has he actually proposed anything that would make any real difference? If he has, I've obviously missed it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?