Sophrosyne
Registered User
- Messages
- 1,590
I hear you and would say that most people would agree.While in theory I agree that's the idea, history has shown in practice the model of having the Govt of the day hold the HSE to account doesn't work. That's before we even touch on the other side of the coin, which is the political interference exerted on the HSE's decision making process too. The current model isn't fit for purpose, and we'll still be talking about the same problems with our healthcare system in another 20 years unless we change tack.
However, for the very reasons you have mentioned, it is unlikely that a different health entity would perform any better.
We have to discuss tangible facts.
We can all see that in this case and I am trying to stick to eHealth, it is a fact that administrators did not follow the eHealth Strategy.
They have instead added considerably to the cost of the national rollout in terms of delays and overspend of public money by developing standalone systems.
In terms of accountability - as a first step - I am trying to get to who sanctioned these processes, if indeed they were sanctioned.
As mentioned previously, they are not taking place in an underground bunker.