DirectDevil
Registered User
- Messages
- 902
No, it's tax evasion, plain and simple.
Out of interest at what point in time would the act (retrospective formation of a syndicate) become one of tax evasion ?
If the opportunity to engage in retrospective syndicate formation is available before payment of winnings occurs could that not be used as a valid mechanism of tax avoidance ? Otherwise, the only certain way to counter this would be for a syndicate to formulate it's agreement and to lodge it somewhere, on a formal basis, so that retrospective syndicate formation could not occur.