Which is more than I can say for landlords who I know who did rent allowance or HAP.
Or private tenants who are being priced out of the market by the state.
Brendan
Some recent experience on seeking to let a property to DCC under their LTL scheme:
Overall it's possibly simple enough for properties that have recently been refurbished from top to bottom, new builds or recently purchased buy to lets.
- Their standards are very high. Their surveyors will examine the property top to bottom and "issues" that have never caused a problem in 100+ years of occupation of the house by its owners/private tenants will be show-stoppers for the council. For example, very small gaps in the party wall in the attic of a 100+ year old house will not be acceptable, if the windows are big enough to meet fire exit requirements but are not very large they may request that hinges are changed to increase the opening area.
- They offer no solutions in respect of the issues raised. Owner must resolve everything privately.
- There is no list of contractors/surveyors/certifiers that they require you to use to meet the requirements they set.
- The lease cannot be executed without appointing a lawyer. Presumably there is some sort of lien on the property that gets registered on the folio.
- There is a requirement to obtain the "consent" of the lender if there is a mortgage on the property. However, there is no prescribed form or standard wording.
- It is necessary to have the Council noted on the insurance policy, which the owner must retain. Some insurers may not be willing to provide insurance on a house let to the council/this type of letting may be regarded as riskier for the insurer and may attract a higher premium. The council offer no solution in this regard.
- Full certification is required in respect of electricity supply, fire alarm systems and gas supplies. This must be
- The property has to have a D1 energy rating or better. This may increase in the future.
- Oil/Gas boiler has to have been installed in the last 5 years or this is a show-stopper.
- All white goods have to be less than 6 months old with receipts/guarantees even if they are in perfect working order/high-end models - must dump anything more than 6 months old and replace with new or lease will not proceed.
- Council want a right of first refusal in event of sale of property during the lease term. This may mean the owner won't get full MV for the property if they have to sell.
- Tax Clearance certificate, NPPR certificate of discharge, LPT record.
- Exacting furniture requirements.
- No negotiation on rental valuation offered.
- No sense that there is a crisis of accommodation - if anything, they appear to have a good supply of property being made available and are in no rush to secure one-off properties.
Has anyone gone through the process and if so, can they offer a ballpark for the cost of the legals, surveys etc.?
If your tenant is already under the HAP scheme, can you change to the Long Term Letting Scheme?
How old are your children? Presuming quite young if you're looking to rent out for 10 years.Picking up this thread again as I have a couple of questions. We are investigating the possibility of purchasing an investment property for our children to live in for college/early years of working, on the basis that we would purchase near where they would likely attend or sell and purchase a new one if that turns out to be a different location. Still very early exploratory spreadsheet musings!
Has anyone exited such a scheme? What happens to the tenants after say a ten year lease? Are they made aware at the start that they will be moving eventually? Has anyone struggled with getting vacant possession at the end of the lease? Would this be more likely if it is a house rather than an apartment on the basis that a house would be more likely used to house a family who would put down more roots, have children in local schools etc.
Has anyone experienced difficulty in getting insurance cover for a property in this scheme?
Has anyone experienced difficulty in getting approval from a bank to enter the scheme, assuming the property is already on an investment rate and is up to date on payments etc?
Has anyone experienced issues in getting approval from the management company of an apartment block to enter the scheme?
I assume that under RPZ that the ending rent paid by the council becomes the baseline for rent going forward. Any other impacts in that regard, or is this an incorrect assumption?
Has anyone entered this scheme after first entering the Living City Initiative? probably a question for the council as to whether the two are mutually exclusive. Or in reality the standards required for the long term lease scheme would make it too expensive to renovate an older property.
Thanks for any info!
If you:Is it the case that eventually you'll want to buy them a place to stay near potential colleges that they might potentially go to?
Has your friend had a rent review after 3 years and if yes, what sort of increase percentage can be expected?I know someone who has been in this scheme for about 4 years now.
I was talking to him a couple of weeks ago and he was talking about contacting the council to extend it to 25 years. He is currently 4 years into a 10 year contract.
He must be happy with it if he wants to extend it already without even having done half his first contract.
Has your friend had a rent review after 3 years and if yes, what sort of increase percentage can be expected?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?