I think the details [of what the child's long-term needs are likely to be] are highly relevant. The problem is they are only likely to emerge slowly, over a period of years. Which is why I think flexibility is key here, at least initially — don't buy into restrictions that mean you can't use the money to meet the child's needs as they unfold. E.g. if your wealth is largely represented by the equity in your house, and you need to access that wealth to meet the needs of your now-adult child, but you still have three younger dependent children living at home, that's not a great fit.We do have few details and when people asked for more details, they were told by other posters that they were irrelevant.
And, in many cases, pensions can be accessed early from age 50.Again, depending on age, and the extent to which the pension is well funded already, they might choose not to "tie up" their money in a pension.
if your wealth is largely represented by the equity in your house,
They're are.However later they were able to start saving, they took advantage of every state saving scheme available. Don’t think there are any currently on offer but keep an eye out.
You mean SSIA?I was thinking of the SISA and occasional offerings like that
Before I speak with a solicitor, I’d love to understand what general principles or structures others have used
The real challenging question here is: How soon can one reasonably gauge whether a child will be able to live independently or sustain employment?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?